46.8 sec in total
558 ms
21.5 sec
24.7 sec
Visit sixrevisions.com now to see the best up-to-date Six Revisions content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about sixrevisions.com
Get tips, strategies, and expert insights on all things web design with the latest web design blog posts from the WebFX team.
Visit sixrevisions.comWe analyzed Sixrevisions.com page load time and found that the first response time was 558 ms and then it took 46.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.
sixrevisions.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.3 s
73/100
10%
Value7.7 s
3/100
25%
Value5.6 s
52/100
10%
Value3,620 ms
1/100
30%
Value0.002
100/100
15%
Value9.8 s
28/100
10%
558 ms
2346 ms
397 ms
624 ms
176 ms
Our browser made a total of 65 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Sixrevisions.com, 66% (43 requests) were made to Webpagefx.com and 11% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (6.3 sec) relates to the external source Stats.g.doubleclick.net.
Page size can be reduced by 426.1 kB (31%)
1.4 MB
960.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Sixrevisions.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 714.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 64.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 11.5 kB, which is 15% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 64.0 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 28.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Six Revisions images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 242.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 242.2 kB or 50% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 90.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sixrevisions.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 90.9 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (46%)
50
27
The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Six Revisions. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
sixrevisions.com
558 ms
2346 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
397 ms
css
624 ms
blog.min.css
176 ms
fonts.css
295 ms
jquery.js
291 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
517 ms
api.js
563 ms
extrawatch.js
517 ms
jdownloadurl.js
517 ms
heatmap.js
563 ms
global.min.js
515 ms
blog-mobile-nav.js
1635 ms
wp-embed.min.js
1635 ms
ga.js
1621 ms
js_visitor_settings.php
1033 ms
__utm.gif
126 ms
vis_opt.js
487 ms
v.gif
61 ms
collect
6284 ms
bg-masthead-innerpage.jpg
4737 ms
pinit_fg_en_round_red_16.png
6160 ms
logo-webpagefx.png
4148 ms
transparency-85-black.png
3992 ms
transparency-50-black.png
3899 ms
webpageFX-fx.png
4885 ms
revenue-icon-mega-nav.svg
3992 ms
marketing-cloud-icon-mega-nav.svg
4076 ms
marketingcloudfx2-sm.png
4313 ms
leads-icon-mega-nav.svg
4312 ms
revenue-2-icon-mega-nav.svg
4770 ms
testimonials-icon-mega-nav.svg
4566 ms
white-logo-sm.png
4770 ms
bg-masthead.png
5604 ms
sixrevisionsheader.jpg
4476 ms
UX-header-image.png
5413 ms
icon_blog-marketing.svg
5045 ms
web-design-ux-header.png
5427 ms
icon_blog-design.svg
5233 ms
traffic-drop-redesign.png
5160 ms
computer-2242266_1920.jpg
5527 ms
office-583839_1920-1.jpg
5527 ms
0599-03-the-software-guild-logo.png
5527 ms
apple-devices-1839874_1920.jpg
5525 ms
grade-your-website-cta.png
5526 ms
recognized-by-logos.png
5849 ms
icon-google-plus-author.gif
5849 ms
ga-audiences
3964 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
2902 ms
Jzo62I39jc0gQRrbndN6nfesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf
3906 ms
d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
5468 ms
mnpfi9pxYH-Go5UiibESIqCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
5467 ms
SocialIconFont.woff
1729 ms
icomoon.woff
1727 ms
W4wDsBUluyw0tK3tykhXEfesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf
5467 ms
12mE4jfMSBTmg-81EiS-YS3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
5467 ms
t6Nd4cfPRhZP44Q5QAjcC50EAVxt0G0biEntp43Qt6E.ttf
5467 ms
icomoonfont.ttf
1301 ms
roboto-regular-webfont.woff
1299 ms
count.js
4748 ms
lmfx.min.js
4661 ms
ctfx.min.js
4662 ms
jquery.min.js
4836 ms
5
2031 ms
sixrevisions.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
sixrevisions.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
sixrevisions.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sixrevisions.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sixrevisions.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
sixrevisions.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Six Revisions. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: