6.1 sec in total
1.2 sec
4.4 sec
431 ms
Welcome to skpel.ru homepage info - get ready to check Skpel best content for Russia right away, or after learning these important things about skpel.ru
Деревянные дома от компании «Белый Журавль» по технологии благородного домостроения. Опыт 20 лет! ☎ (812) 385‑56-45
Visit skpel.ruWe analyzed Skpel.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 1.2 sec and then it took 4.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
skpel.ru performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.7 s
30/100
10%
Value5.5 s
20/100
25%
Value6.6 s
38/100
10%
Value1,520 ms
14/100
30%
Value0.022
100/100
15%
Value11.6 s
19/100
10%
1248 ms
137 ms
712 ms
310 ms
549 ms
Our browser made a total of 82 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 28% of them (23 requests) were addressed to the original Skpel.ru, 26% (21 requests) were made to Pbs.twimg.com and 15% (12 requests) were made to Vk.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Skpel.ru.
Page size can be reduced by 607.9 kB (37%)
1.6 MB
1.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Skpel.ru main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 770.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 20.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 20.8 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 841 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Skpel images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 500.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 500.9 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 85.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Skpel.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 85.4 kB or 79% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 32 (42%)
77
45
The browser has sent 77 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Skpel. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
skpel.ru
1248 ms
analytics.js
137 ms
general.min.css
712 ms
highslide.min.css
310 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.css
549 ms
collect
14 ms
openapi.js
381 ms
jquery.min.js
754 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
15 ms
autoNumeric.min.js
531 ms
inputmask.min.js
696 ms
jquery.inputmask.min.js
344 ms
jquery.fancybox.pack.js
619 ms
init.min.js
532 ms
conversion.js
20 ms
collect
67 ms
logo.png
484 ms
header-icon-home.svg
211 ms
900e1343be7a8f9a0a77771096ace9dd.png
700 ms
481ea46287293179f00fa77c79ff1032.png
175 ms
40576dc0ee5ee956e56a8c77868663d3.png
822 ms
cf3b7078396eb148c0dfee6129c81195.png
847 ms
proff_brus_dom01.jpg
427 ms
proff_kark_dom02.jpg
557 ms
skpel_8x9_domizbrusa_2yp_thm.jpg
699 ms
footer-logo.png
761 ms
DINPro-Regular.woff
1358 ms
HypatiaSansPro-Semibold.woff
2496 ms
DINPro-Bold.woff
1363 ms
upload.gif
123 ms
widgets.js
32 ms
widget_community.php
280 ms
hit
270 ms
watch.js
5 ms
60 ms
gtm.js
58 ms
timeline.0eae788bc4fdbe9cd3e72dca3bc26358.js
36 ms
syndication
89 ms
651083950396436480
284 ms
48 ms
hit
130 ms
loader_nav19239_3.js
122 ms
lite.css
128 ms
lite.js
408 ms
lang3_0.js
256 ms
widget_community.css
266 ms
xdm.js
258 ms
al_community.js
257 ms
timeline.f7130f11be9c2719286897ede16853b9.light.ltr.css
5 ms
timeline.f7130f11be9c2719286897ede16853b9.light.ltr.css
9 ms
8U4LbDj1_normal.png
280 ms
CfgNjYqW4AAymWq.jpg:small
403 ms
CfRfuYSWIAAMYeN.jpg:small
486 ms
CfHQF5FWQAAUFkR.jpg:small
476 ms
Ce-rWXRW8AIVUih.jpg:small
483 ms
Cevtu6_WsAEMdns.jpg:small
537 ms
Cene-axWAAAULbr.jpg:small
481 ms
CeYXtPRWIAEJpJd.jpg:small
548 ms
CePn9ieVAAA7PXH.jpg:small
572 ms
Cd5b-TyXEAAuH0j.jpg:small
556 ms
Cdp-lYpW4AA6VIT.jpg:small
626 ms
Cdf53TBUIAQ-opR.jpg:small
1119 ms
CdQQDDmW4AAMnMw.jpg:small
658 ms
CdQPvrCWwAEb5sJ.jpg:small
678 ms
CcxetGYW0AA_kr2.jpg:small
691 ms
Cco1j2ZWEAAeEC-.jpg:small
755 ms
Cco1KuQW0AABerF.jpg:small
1051 ms
CcXdJfnWEAAxcNu.jpg:small
829 ms
CcTqnBhW4AAvN2w.jpg:small
1059 ms
CcEGLrAXEAACVh_.jpg:small
803 ms
Cb43acxWwAAAxEz.jpg:small
1056 ms
uJHPt_RNatM.jpg
403 ms
C_nnsQ0s5Hk.jpg
407 ms
YaMViMFyn40.jpg
403 ms
3nq0XuElw_8.jpg
274 ms
LOJpikkQzV0.jpg
404 ms
eTUjYa_QsVY.jpg
415 ms
2daiHz8JykI.jpg
399 ms
V8Gkik7Aor0.jpg
670 ms
camera_50.png
141 ms
w_logo.png
139 ms
jot
27 ms
skpel.ru accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
skpel.ru best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Registers an unload listener
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
skpel.ru SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
RU
RU
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Skpel.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Skpel.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
skpel.ru
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Skpel. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: