Tools & Wizards About Us
slashcam.de screenshot

Report Summary

  • 83

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    87% of other websites

  • 97

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 91% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

slashcam.de

slashCAM

Page Load Speed

5.5 sec in total

First Response

502 ms

Resources Loaded

2 sec

Page Rendered

3 sec

slashcam.de screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing SlashCAM content for Germany. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about slashcam.de

Infos zum Thema digitale Videotechnik und Filmemachen: Tests, Vergleiche und News zu aktuellen Kameras, Neuerscheinungen und Software sowie Diskussionen zu allen Themen

Visit slashcam.de

Key Findings

We analyzed Slashcam.de page load time and found that the first response time was 502 ms and then it took 5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

slashcam.de performance score

83

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

72/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

80/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.0 s

94/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value330 ms

75/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.2 s

86/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.slashcam.de

502 ms

style.css

96 ms

js

58 ms

lg.php

443 ms

bkgr2.png

127 ms

Our browser made a total of 50 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 96% of them (48 requests) were addressed to the original Slashcam.de, 2% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Banner.slashcam.de. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (867 ms) belongs to the original domain Slashcam.de.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 146.8 kB (67%)

Content Size

219.0 kB

After Optimization

72.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images

In fact, the total size of Slashcam.de main page is 219.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 172.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 146.8 kB

  • Original 172.1 kB
  • After minification 155.5 kB
  • After compression 25.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 146.8 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 8 B

  • Original 46.9 kB
  • After minification 46.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. SlashCAM images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

49

After Optimization

49

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 49 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of SlashCAM. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

www.slashcam.de

www.slashcam.de

502 ms

style.css

style.css

96 ms

js

js

58 ms

lg.php

lg.php

443 ms

bkgr2.png

bkgr2.png

127 ms

slashcam_logoneu2.gif

slashcam_logoneu2.gif

209 ms

67926-500.webp

67926-500.webp

394 ms

67914-500.webp

67914-500.webp

300 ms

67885-500.webp

67885-500.webp

395 ms

b777789cd921b640ce8daaa78d8a2675.jpg

b777789cd921b640ce8daaa78d8a2675.jpg

488 ms

66506-500.webp

66506-500.webp

301 ms

65748-500.webp

65748-500.webp

304 ms

67899-500.webp

67899-500.webp

396 ms

67875-500.webp

67875-500.webp

396 ms

67765-500.webp

67765-500.webp

399 ms

67860-500.webp

67860-500.webp

488 ms

67854-500.webp

67854-500.webp

488 ms

67206-500.webp

67206-500.webp

489 ms

67672-500.webp

67672-500.webp

583 ms

67358-500.webp

67358-500.webp

493 ms

67324-500.webp

67324-500.webp

580 ms

63242-500.webp

63242-500.webp

582 ms

67090-500.webp

67090-500.webp

582 ms

neu_im_forum.gif

neu_im_forum.gif

584 ms

umfrage2023.gif

umfrage2023.gif

587 ms

filmfestivals-2024.gif

filmfestivals-2024.gif

674 ms

67056-500.webp

67056-500.webp

677 ms

67827-500.webp

67827-500.webp

676 ms

67815-500.webp

67815-500.webp

678 ms

50666-500.webp

50666-500.webp

679 ms

50767-500.webp

50767-500.webp

681 ms

50829-500.webp

50829-500.webp

768 ms

67711-500.webp

67711-500.webp

772 ms

67646-500.webp

67646-500.webp

769 ms

67677-500.webp

67677-500.webp

771 ms

67751-500.webp

67751-500.webp

771 ms

67728-500.webp

67728-500.webp

775 ms

67734-500.webp

67734-500.webp

861 ms

50647-500.webp

50647-500.webp

867 ms

50675-500.webp

50675-500.webp

861 ms

50762-500.webp

50762-500.webp

746 ms

67704-500.webp

67704-500.webp

663 ms

67696-500.webp

67696-500.webp

576 ms

66816-500.webp

66816-500.webp

659 ms

67684-500.webp

67684-500.webp

659 ms

66556-500.webp

66556-500.webp

572 ms

67659-500.webp

67659-500.webp

572 ms

67628-500.webp

67628-500.webp

571 ms

66352-500.webp

66352-500.webp

574 ms

ht.php

ht.php

672 ms

Accessibility Review

slashcam.de accessibility score

97

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

slashcam.de best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

slashcam.de SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    DE

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Slashcam.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is German. Our system also found out that Slashcam.de main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

slashcam.de

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of SlashCAM. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: