1.8 sec in total
65 ms
1.3 sec
460 ms
Click here to check amazing Slickwraps content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about slickwraps.com
Our skins are made from the highest-quality materials available and are precision fitted to your device. With our wide selection of colors and designs, we have something for everyone. Our wraps will t...
Visit slickwraps.comWe analyzed Slickwraps.com page load time and found that the first response time was 65 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
slickwraps.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.3 s
41/100
10%
Value3.9 s
51/100
25%
Value4.0 s
81/100
10%
Value1,390 ms
16/100
30%
Value0.008
100/100
15%
Value12.8 s
13/100
10%
65 ms
236 ms
59 ms
70 ms
75 ms
Our browser made a total of 103 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 9% of them (9 requests) were addressed to the original Slickwraps.com, 59% (61 requests) were made to Cdn.slickwraps.com and 4% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (459 ms) relates to the external source Connect.facebook.net.
Page size can be reduced by 1.8 MB (50%)
3.6 MB
1.8 MB
In fact, the total size of Slickwraps.com main page is 3.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 70.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 70.4 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 43.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Slickwraps images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.2 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.2 MB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 528.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Slickwraps.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 528.6 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 59 (68%)
87
28
The browser has sent 87 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Slickwraps. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 35 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
slickwraps.com
65 ms
slickwraps.com
236 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.css
59 ms
styles.css
70 ms
widgets.css
75 ms
style.css
73 ms
sociallogin.css
74 ms
mobilesociallogin.css
77 ms
rwd.css
75 ms
ajaxcart.css
75 ms
customheader.css
77 ms
slideshow.css
76 ms
settings.css
78 ms
megamenu.css
80 ms
skin.css
82 ms
catalog.css
80 ms
local.css
88 ms
owl.carousel.css
96 ms
owl.theme.css
81 ms
owl.transitions.css
81 ms
custom.css
96 ms
animation.css
81 ms
grid.css
82 ms
retina.css
82 ms
font-awesome.css
95 ms
options_base_default.css
96 ms
override.css
99 ms
widgets.css
96 ms
like.css
94 ms
settings.css
99 ms
dynamic.css
97 ms
static.css
101 ms
a619bcb7a953c4fb1e8a78664b6bd0f7.js
113 ms
css
196 ms
jquery.navobile.min.js
99 ms
scriptcustom.js
57 ms
css
242 ms
performance.js
99 ms
print.css
56 ms
ga.js
135 ms
widget.js
73 ms
gtm.js
132 ms
menu2.jpg
59 ms
swlogo.png
30 ms
user.png
30 ms
search.png
32 ms
dummy.png
32 ms
ajax-loader.gif
30 ms
note5new.jpg
31 ms
s6edgeplus22.jpg
33 ms
s6new.jpg
33 ms
6p.jpg
32 ms
i6s.jpg
45 ms
i6splus.jpg
44 ms
comming.jpg
45 ms
menu3.jpg
46 ms
menu4.jpg
82 ms
menu5.jpg
90 ms
menu6.jpg
139 ms
menu7_2.jpg
141 ms
anMUvcNT0H1YN4FII8wpr4e2tK5W43RXgBRKkM4A5Qg.ttf
140 ms
anMUvcNT0H1YN4FII8wprzsSLeNQG2cy_mKit6iEdYs.ttf
143 ms
7XUFZ5tgS-tD6QamInJTcU3KvHLhcNjEHFQzwNtdMQY.ttf
165 ms
anMUvcNT0H1YN4FII8wpr93Z6MveExszb-iKWJY7ddA.ttf
181 ms
effra_std_rg-webfont.woff
43 ms
effra_std_lt-webfont.woff
41 ms
effra_std_md-webfont.woff
42 ms
sdk.js
432 ms
widget.css
10 ms
fbevents.js
459 ms
css
27 ms
slick_gallery_large.jpg
57 ms
slick_trees_large.jpg
55 ms
slick_eight_large.jpg
57 ms
slick_nepal_large.jpg
53 ms
__utm.gif
43 ms
__utm.gif
46 ms
connect_icons.png
30 ms
chat-icon.png
31 ms
analytics.js
90 ms
hotjar-60946.js
273 ms
proximanova-regular-webfont.woff
25 ms
collect
92 ms
tracking.js
301 ms
4269162b-1e00-4e7a-9124-5b4d9a0c174d.js
93 ms
ga-audiences
172 ms
collect
149 ms
all.js
325 ms
widgets.js
214 ms
totop_arrows.png
146 ms
i
136 ms
conversion_async.js
146 ms
coloredbg.png
32 ms
revicons.woff
51 ms
revicons.woff
51 ms
ga-audiences
66 ms
iPhone.Natural.Series.Bamboo.grass.HP_new.jpg
140 ms
modules-1f5c71aea63f8df71401422ed80fbe5f.js
118 ms
113 ms
script_data.js
216 ms
146 ms
30 ms
24 ms
slickwraps.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
slickwraps.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
slickwraps.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Slickwraps.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Slickwraps.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
slickwraps.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Slickwraps. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: