3.8 sec in total
201 ms
3 sec
574 ms
Visit slideplayer.es now to see the best up-to-date Slide Player content for Peru and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about slideplayer.es
Visit slideplayer.esWe analyzed Slideplayer.es page load time and found that the first response time was 201 ms and then it took 3.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
slideplayer.es performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.6 s
63/100
10%
Value5.7 s
17/100
25%
Value7.3 s
28/100
10%
Value2,430 ms
5/100
30%
Value0.112
86/100
15%
Value20.1 s
2/100
10%
201 ms
239 ms
371 ms
190 ms
42 ms
Our browser made a total of 101 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 9% of them (9 requests) were addressed to the original Slideplayer.es, 86% (87 requests) were made to Player.slideplayer.es and 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Slideplayer.es.
Page size can be reduced by 825.5 kB (47%)
1.8 MB
946.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Slideplayer.es main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 917.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 51.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 10.0 kB, which is 17% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 51.0 kB or 88% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 54.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Slide Player images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 47.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 47.8 kB or 61% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 672.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Slideplayer.es needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 672.6 kB or 94% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (9%)
100
91
The browser has sent 100 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Slide Player. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
slideplayer.es
201 ms
total.css
239 ms
total.js
371 ms
homepage.css
190 ms
analytics.js
42 ms
thumb.jpg
283 ms
thumb.jpg
282 ms
thumb.jpg
281 ms
thumb.jpg
280 ms
thumb.jpg
282 ms
thumb.jpg
284 ms
thumb.jpg
376 ms
thumb.jpg
374 ms
thumb.jpg
375 ms
thumb.jpg
373 ms
thumb.jpg
377 ms
thumb.jpg
380 ms
thumb.jpg
465 ms
thumb.jpg
470 ms
thumb.jpg
467 ms
thumb.jpg
465 ms
thumb.jpg
469 ms
thumb.jpg
478 ms
thumb.jpg
557 ms
thumb.jpg
557 ms
thumb.jpg
557 ms
thumb.jpg
563 ms
thumb.jpg
561 ms
thumb.jpg
573 ms
thumb.jpg
648 ms
thumb.jpg
649 ms
thumb.jpg
650 ms
thumb.jpg
656 ms
thumb.jpg
657 ms
thumb.jpg
666 ms
thumb.jpg
740 ms
thumb.jpg
742 ms
thumb.jpg
741 ms
thumb.jpg
744 ms
thumb.jpg
750 ms
cubes.png
110 ms
bg_logo.jpg
110 ms
logo_slide.png
110 ms
851 ms
concrete_wall.png
366 ms
collect
9 ms
collect
62 ms
pixel.gif
1133 ms
player.js
585 ms
137 ms
img5.jpg
197 ms
img0.jpg
199 ms
img1.jpg
174 ms
img2.jpg
212 ms
img3.jpg
178 ms
img4.jpg
179 ms
img6.jpg
221 ms
img7.png
234 ms
img8.png
263 ms
img9.png
286 ms
img10.png
290 ms
img11.jpg
302 ms
img15.jpg
311 ms
img12.png
419 ms
img13.png
355 ms
img14.gif
377 ms
img18.jpg
384 ms
img16.png
393 ms
img17.jpg
405 ms
img23.jpg
447 ms
img19.jpg
469 ms
img20.jpg
480 ms
img21.jpg
483 ms
img22.jpg
498 ms
img25.jpg
508 ms
img24.jpg
537 ms
img29.jpg
560 ms
img28.png
570 ms
img31.jpg
665 ms
img33.jpg
591 ms
img32.png
598 ms
img34.png
629 ms
img35.jpg
650 ms
img36.jpg
662 ms
img37.jpg
682 ms
player_api
98 ms
img38.jpg
580 ms
img39.jpg
555 ms
img40.jpg
575 ms
fnt0.woff
766 ms
www-widgetapi.js
22 ms
fnt1.woff
573 ms
img41.jpg
603 ms
img42.jpg
585 ms
img43.jpg
602 ms
img45.jpg
702 ms
img44.jpg
597 ms
img46.png
602 ms
img47.jpg
602 ms
img48.png
612 ms
img49.jpg
640 ms
slideplayer.es accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
slideplayer.es best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
slideplayer.es SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
ES
ES
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Slideplayer.es can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Spanish is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Slideplayer.es main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
slideplayer.es
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Slide Player. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: