40.8 sec in total
1.4 sec
27.8 sec
11.6 sec
Click here to check amazing Slipstick content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about slipstick.com
Help for Beginners to Advanced Outlook users and Exchange Administrators at the Microsoft Outlook and Exchange Server Solutions Center. VBA Code samples.
Visit slipstick.comWe analyzed Slipstick.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.4 sec and then it took 39.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.
slipstick.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.8 s
1/100
10%
Value7.9 s
3/100
25%
Value8.8 s
15/100
10%
Value330 ms
75/100
30%
Value0.199
62/100
15%
Value12.9 s
13/100
10%
1384 ms
2032 ms
666 ms
6356 ms
7056 ms
Our browser made a total of 59 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 5% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Slipstick.com, 17% (10 requests) were made to Media.slipstick.com and 17% (10 requests) were made to Static.slipstick.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (8.8 sec) relates to the external source B.slipstick.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.3 MB (62%)
2.1 MB
814.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Slipstick.com main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 72.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 72.8 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 188.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Slipstick needs image optimization as it can save up to 188.3 kB or 43% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 628.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 628.4 kB or 61% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 412.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Slipstick.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 412.6 kB or 76% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (72%)
54
15
The browser has sent 54 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Slipstick. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
slipstick.com
1384 ms
www.slipstick.com
2032 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
666 ms
widget.css
6356 ms
simple-payments.css
7056 ms
style.css
6335 ms
polls-css.css
7056 ms
twitter-feed.css
6334 ms
xenword-public.css
7031 ms
css
6470 ms
font-awesome.min.css
7567 ms
tab.css
6898 ms
jetpack.css
7167 ms
jquery.js
7287 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
6849 ms
adsense.js
6849 ms
tab.js
6846 ms
adsbygoogle.js
8680 ms
Sequence2.aspx
8781 ms
brand
7107 ms
dashicons.min.css
6845 ms
display-structure.css
6845 ms
front.css
8487 ms
underscore.min.js
6982 ms
front.min.js
7102 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
8678 ms
polls-js.js
6844 ms
comment-reply.min.js
7103 ms
hoverIntent.min.js
8486 ms
superfish.js
7104 ms
superfish.args.js
6825 ms
responsive-menu.js
7035 ms
wp-embed.min.js
7035 ms
backbone.min.js
6824 ms
front-end-deps.js
8607 ms
front-end.js
6804 ms
e-201736.js
8381 ms
Addon-Oct2016.png
1809 ms
absolute-beginners-guide.jpg
1690 ms
mvp-icon.png
1690 ms
a.aspx
1691 ms
analytics.js
1796 ms
ca-pub-8149768367434061.js
514 ms
zrt_lookup.html
3195 ms
show_ads_impl.js
339 ms
blank.gif
298 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
2826 ms
pla
1530 ms
mapilab-toolbox-180x150.gif
1503 ms
collect
281 ms
comp-link-180x150.png
730 ms
BackupForWorkgroups-180x150.jpg
728 ms
widget.aspx
2349 ms
googlelogo_lightgrey_46x16dp.png
532 ms
a.aspx
502 ms
stellar-password-160x600.jpg
1416 ms
css
361 ms
metrics.js
181 ms
g.gif
3070 ms
slipstick.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Form elements do not have associated labels
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
slipstick.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
slipstick.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Slipstick.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Slipstick.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
slipstick.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Slipstick. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: