4.1 sec in total
690 ms
3.2 sec
248 ms
Click here to check amazing Smatch content for Germany. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about smatch.com
Trends, Fashion und die neuste Designermode ✓ | Finde dein neues Outfit jetzt hier ✓ | Viele Artikel jetzt im Outlet bis zu 50% reduziert ✓ | smatch.com
Visit smatch.comWe analyzed Smatch.com page load time and found that the first response time was 690 ms and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
smatch.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.1 s
80/100
10%
Value2.7 s
86/100
25%
Value2.6 s
97/100
10%
Value1,640 ms
12/100
30%
Value0.047
99/100
15%
Value6.5 s
59/100
10%
690 ms
118 ms
240 ms
49 ms
74 ms
Our browser made a total of 90 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 13% of them (12 requests) were addressed to the original Smatch.com, 17% (15 requests) were made to Scontent.xx.fbcdn.net and 16% (14 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (690 ms) belongs to the original domain Smatch.com.
Page size can be reduced by 254.4 kB (27%)
942.9 kB
688.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Smatch.com main page is 942.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 599.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 110.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 110.0 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 7.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Smatch images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 115.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 115.4 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 21.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Smatch.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 21.6 kB or 77% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 44 (53%)
83
39
The browser has sent 83 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Smatch. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 31 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
smatch.com
690 ms
global.min.46ad1ced.css
118 ms
home.min.7e2caaa4.css
240 ms
OneSignalSDK.js
49 ms
gtm.js
74 ms
sdk.js
76 ms
full_categories.js
454 ms
instore-loader-min.js
472 ms
dc.js
92 ms
b0027e4b776a90b16d82eebf19cde8af_2015-10-08_smatch_teaser_winter-accessoires.jpg
586 ms
25e489061a24d916a855b1a01412cb7b_smatch_teaser_schuhpaar_bootcamp.jpg
587 ms
4d2bd3d4e01b4ae316104a83dce7c2dc_push-notifications.jpg
587 ms
c44c035f6bbea7d97c7d16bb920c24e4_2015-10-08_smatch_teaser_hugo-boss.jpg
592 ms
081926f45c43457513271fd417d23827_2015-10-08_smatch_teaser_michael-kors.jpg
592 ms
28bb73129c3a43d24fd2c656c83bf947_2015-10-08_smatch_teaser_woolrich.jpg
674 ms
logo175x29.png
133 ms
logo.png
184 ms
sprite.png
222 ms
fbevents.js
31 ms
body_home.min.eb2a0b1b.js
253 ms
footer_medien.jpg
325 ms
body.min.88cf479d.js
312 ms
89 ms
__utm.gif
38 ms
54 ms
xd_arbiter.php
98 ms
ga-audiences
41 ms
instore-min.html
183 ms
adex.js
515 ms
adex.js
508 ms
page.php
147 ms
80cd3f8375ba0d89a95e4894b4f99e5a_2015-10-08_smatch_slider_mantel_gross.jpg
546 ms
PGVGVQG1jIH.css
49 ms
snZMtuAVbNG.css
57 ms
_rx8naC75Dy.js
77 ms
t-KLv3gqZy0.js
71 ms
O6mvGXq05ee.js
101 ms
wyIfBc7KBcg.js
101 ms
wFYNJ9lyaMJ.js
99 ms
Xs81m_2832G.js
99 ms
instore.js
172 ms
74922
210 ms
12074855_10156194442850074_1713196022185680929_n.jpg
101 ms
10551120_10155194350995074_2104318062402720871_n.jpg
32 ms
11990397_1001375529909799_740785458108526033_n.jpg
37 ms
12321166_10207989084635315_7442334912581707337_n.jpg
36 ms
10262263_516929501742478_3048267450597686588_n.jpg
34 ms
12573682_197788513905948_4490946772999444338_n.jpg
34 ms
1780828_256977474633394_3080042774141383974_n.jpg
38 ms
12592474_1462910557180878_6905888764011447519_n.jpg
43 ms
12795278_148420995545886_1067011986137378543_n.jpg
45 ms
10360464_478233838989312_6963367771256063504_n.jpg
45 ms
480554_1520019578327062_5068572183748862146_n.jpg
47 ms
11891254_688790717921944_2873426550534539491_n.jpg
46 ms
12646997_1089920994381292_1216626816250175842_n.jpg
47 ms
12742479_1124083710967673_2521282351233800100_n.jpg
48 ms
10574271_697863640299311_5913399005765926385_n.jpg
47 ms
wL6VQj7Ab77.png
16 ms
CSXXCvknpgK.png
17 ms
adition.js
484 ms
js
377 ms
R9a_DtVRZgv.js
8 ms
cUDgRFxaoIk.js
8 ms
0JBr1QHp8Gi.js
8 ms
kDOzhTr2W91.js
10 ms
t.js
86 ms
t.js
166 ms
analytic.js
165 ms
180 ms
1.gif
250 ms
banner
98 ms
usersync.gif
340 ms
pixel
55 ms
uid.html
91 ms
pixel
16 ms
cm.gif
87 ms
2.gif
88 ms
instore-min.html
156 ms
74922
114 ms
js
89 ms
2.gif
86 ms
2.gif
88 ms
banner
94 ms
nr-852.min.js
46 ms
a0c5214a11bbb262c60a19cb8ca18aaa_2015-10-08_smatch_slider_denim_gross.jpg
403 ms
12 ms
__utm.gif
23 ms
90b2047d960572a2810720de78ac887a_2015-10-08_smatch_slider_maenner_gross3.jpg
295 ms
5aec541387007eaa76c2e555e6925a80_2015-10-08_smatch_slider_metallic_gross.jpg
382 ms
08de23ab21
117 ms
smatch.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
smatch.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
smatch.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Smatch.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Smatch.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
smatch.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Smatch. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: