4.5 sec in total
35 ms
3.1 sec
1.3 sec
Welcome to smfr.com homepage info - get ready to check Smfr best content right away, or after learning these important things about smfr.com
Visit smfr.comWe analyzed Smfr.com page load time and found that the first response time was 35 ms and then it took 4.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
smfr.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value12.2 s
0/100
10%
Value21.4 s
0/100
25%
Value29.0 s
0/100
10%
Value1,310 ms
18/100
30%
Value0.304
39/100
15%
Value58.9 s
0/100
10%
35 ms
1721 ms
19 ms
15 ms
18 ms
Our browser made a total of 75 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 77% of them (58 requests) were addressed to the original Smfr.com, 7% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 7% (5 requests) were made to Gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Smfr.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (7%)
17.8 MB
16.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Smfr.com main page is 17.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 16.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 51.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 51.1 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 289.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Smfr images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 475.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 475.6 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 418.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Smfr.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 418.0 kB or 88% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (54%)
68
31
The browser has sent 68 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Smfr. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
smfr.com
35 ms
www.smfr.com
1721 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
19 ms
styles.css
15 ms
style.min.css
18 ms
bwg_frontend.css
16 ms
sumoselect.css
18 ms
font-awesome.css
22 ms
jquery.mCustomScrollbar.css
18 ms
css
37 ms
css
44 ms
css
48 ms
style.css
18 ms
shortcodes.css
21 ms
shortcodes_responsive.css
24 ms
jquery.js
29 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
22 ms
bwg_frontend.js
21 ms
jquery.sumoselect.min.js
22 ms
jquery.mobile.js
24 ms
jquery.mCustomScrollbar.concat.min.js
25 ms
jquery.fullscreen-0.4.1.js
23 ms
bwg_gallery_box.js
24 ms
main-styles.css
17 ms
frontend-builder-style.css
30 ms
concrete_seamless.png
4 ms
logo_v11.png
3 ms
fire-trucks.jpg
683 ms
IMG_3335-cropped.jpg
1067 ms
311-front-view-flag-mount-daytime.MP4.Still002.jpg
122 ms
boy-scouts.jpg
1126 ms
ladder-sign.jpg
918 ms
rapelling.jpg
1063 ms
12591976_1258086044207853_740941774_o-3.jpg
177 ms
12576215_1257969297552861_1091345523_n.jpg
196 ms
0106_BRLO_FIRE3.jpg
216 ms
0106_BRLO_FIRE2.jpg
226 ms
work-comp-grant.jpg
244 ms
calendar1.png
250 ms
financials.png
253 ms
employment_opp.png
260 ms
meetus1.png
271 ms
sr63xTucDSbOV6kDLSAZiA.ttf
12 ms
Mef17w3J4CtS0lw4Wa_8ry3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
13 ms
campfiresparks.jpg
286 ms
stationmap.png
322 ms
frontend-builder-global-functions.js
265 ms
jquery.form.min.js
269 ms
scripts.js
273 ms
gallery.min.js
278 ms
custom.js
291 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
296 ms
waypoints.min.js
300 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.js
313 ms
frontend-builder-scripts.js
357 ms
wp-embed.min.js
360 ms
salvattore.min.js
372 ms
jquery.easypiechart.js
398 ms
141009-F-DT489-056.jpg
1323 ms
grey_wash_wall.png
652 ms
Dollarphotoclub_85273179.jpg
1274 ms
api.js
64 ms
tUrrMQoBrJbKyZFfX9xzeQ.ttf
6 ms
ETmodules_v2_4.ttf
890 ms
recaptcha__en.js
164 ms
ajax-loader.gif
401 ms
fallback
27 ms
fallback__ltr.css
4 ms
payload
22 ms
css
55 ms
logo_48.png
10 ms
refresh.png
7 ms
audio.png
22 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
29 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
32 ms
smfr.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
smfr.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
smfr.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Smfr.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Smfr.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
smfr.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Smfr. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: