7.3 sec in total
1.8 sec
4.8 sec
669 ms
Welcome to snaparticle.com homepage info - get ready to check Snaparticle best content right away, or after learning these important things about snaparticle.com
Snaparticle
Visit snaparticle.comWe analyzed Snaparticle.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.8 sec and then it took 5.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster. This domain responded with an error, which can significantly jeopardize Snaparticle.com rating and web reputation
snaparticle.com performance score
1823 ms
105 ms
56 ms
80 ms
23 ms
Our browser made a total of 64 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 34% of them (22 requests) were addressed to the original Snaparticle.com, 36% (23 requests) were made to Cbproads.com and 6% (4 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Snaparticle.com.
Page size can be reduced by 377.9 kB (38%)
997.3 kB
619.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Snaparticle.com main page is 997.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 580.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 112.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 15.3 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 112.4 kB or 87% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 43.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Snaparticle images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 112.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 112.9 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 109.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Snaparticle.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 109.5 kB or 88% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (46%)
54
29
The browser has sent 54 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Snaparticle. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.snaparticle.com
1823 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
105 ms
style.css
56 ms
style.css
80 ms
css
23 ms
font-awesome.css
95 ms
jPushMenu.css
75 ms
animate.css
98 ms
quick_search.js
87 ms
jquery.js
152 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
116 ms
wow.js
116 ms
wow-init.js
124 ms
parallax.js
125 ms
navigation.js
109 ms
skip-link-focus-fix.js
171 ms
jPushMenu.js
125 ms
jquery.placeholder.js
169 ms
placeholdertext.js
172 ms
sensible.scripts.js
173 ms
wp-embed.min.js
174 ms
init.js
174 ms
all.js
328 ms
widgets.js
31 ms
send_binary.asp
664 ms
send_binary.asp
648 ms
send_binary.asp
748 ms
send_binary.asp
736 ms
send_binary.asp
647 ms
send_binary.asp
308 ms
send_binary.asp
658 ms
send_binary.asp
705 ms
send_binary.asp
821 ms
send_binary.asp
703 ms
send_binary.asp
886 ms
send_binary.asp
919 ms
send_binary.asp
772 ms
send_binary.asp
955 ms
send_binary.asp
991 ms
send_binary.asp
1035 ms
send_binary.asp
1088 ms
send_binary.asp
1098 ms
send_binary.asp
1120 ms
send_binary.asp
1227 ms
send_binary.asp
1211 ms
send_binary.asp
1383 ms
send_binary.asp
1228 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
300 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
300 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
302 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
301 ms
image_preview.js
290 ms
button.0308b81ff1714e446f674b5b9793f2cd.js
86 ms
76 ms
xd_arbiter.php
203 ms
xd_arbiter.php
301 ms
tweet_button.b9740740e0bcf9b0657c5b11bd4388da.en.html
124 ms
jot.html
1 ms
ping
28 ms
like.php
140 ms
like.php
136 ms
qeKvIRsJabD.js
270 ms
LVx-xkvaJ0b.png
303 ms
qeKvIRsJabD.js
409 ms
snaparticle.com SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Snaparticle.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Snaparticle.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
snaparticle.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Snaparticle. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: