Tools & Wizards About Us
snaper.de screenshot

Report Summary

  • 83

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    88% of other websites

  • 94

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 84% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

snaper.de

Advanced Developer Blog • Computer Science and Machine Learning

Page Load Speed

5.1 sec in total

First Response

1.2 sec

Resources Loaded

3.5 sec

Page Rendered

392 ms

snaper.de screenshot

About Website

Visit snaper.de now to see the best up-to-date Snaper content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about snaper.de

A Blog about advanced development techniques and on how to build intelligent and scalable web applications

Visit snaper.de

Key Findings

We analyzed Snaper.de page load time and found that the first response time was 1.2 sec and then it took 3.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

snaper.de performance score

83

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

74/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

52/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.3 s

98/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value100 ms

98/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.004

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.9 s

88/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

snaper.de

1225 ms

www.snaper.de

851 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

130 ms

socialshareprivacy-min.css

245 ms

gdsr.css.php

305 ms

Our browser made a total of 36 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Snaper.de and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Snaper.de.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 407.4 kB (39%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

642.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Snaper.de main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 543.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 27.2 kB

  • Original 33.9 kB
  • After minification 29.5 kB
  • After compression 6.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.4 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 27.2 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 10.9 kB

  • Original 543.3 kB
  • After minification 532.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Snaper images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 168.8 kB

  • Original 239.0 kB
  • After minification 232.8 kB
  • After compression 70.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 168.8 kB or 71% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 200.5 kB

  • Original 233.9 kB
  • After minification 197.2 kB
  • After compression 33.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Snaper.de needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 200.5 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (64%)

Requests Now

33

After Optimization

12

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 33 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Snaper. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

snaper.de

snaper.de

1225 ms

www.snaper.de

www.snaper.de

851 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

130 ms

socialshareprivacy-min.css

socialshareprivacy-min.css

245 ms

gdsr.css.php

gdsr.css.php

305 ms

public.css

public.css

312 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

398 ms

bootstrap-responsive.min.css

bootstrap-responsive.min.css

699 ms

cyberchimps-responsive.min.css

cyberchimps-responsive.min.css

289 ms

core.css

core.css

367 ms

style.css

style.css

411 ms

elements.css

elements.css

454 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

569 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

481 ms

gdsr.js

gdsr.js

517 ms

jquery.slimbox.min.js

jquery.slimbox.min.js

506 ms

jquery.jcarousel.min.js

jquery.jcarousel.min.js

560 ms

jquery.mobile.custom.min.js

jquery.mobile.custom.min.js

585 ms

swipe-call.min.js

swipe-call.min.js

615 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

620 ms

elements.min.js

elements.min.js

672 ms

social_bookmarks-min.js

social_bookmarks-min.js

691 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

758 ms

retina-1.1.0.min.js

retina-1.1.0.min.js

759 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

760 ms

snaper-logo-Kopie.jpg

snaper-logo-Kopie.jpg

249 ms

App.jpg

App.jpg

340 ms

apple_ipad.jpg

apple_ipad.jpg

657 ms

mobile.jpg

mobile.jpg

206 ms

to_dos-150x150.jpg

to_dos-150x150.jpg

204 ms

lg__lte_30_-150x150.jpg

lg__lte_30_-150x150.jpg

203 ms

latitude_10_tablet-150x150.jpg

latitude_10_tablet-150x150.jpg

240 ms

img8005jpg-150x150.jpg

img8005jpg-150x150.jpg

244 ms

firefox_os_debut_poland-150x150.jpg

firefox_os_debut_poland-150x150.jpg

252 ms

tag.png

tag.png

347 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

446 ms

Accessibility Review

snaper.de accessibility score

94

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

snaper.de best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

snaper.de SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    DE

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Snaper.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed German language. Our system also found out that Snaper.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

snaper.de

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Snaper. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: