4.4 sec in total
78 ms
4 sec
244 ms
Visit snapf.com now to see the best up-to-date Snapf content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about snapf.com
Visit snapf.comWe analyzed Snapf.com page load time and found that the first response time was 78 ms and then it took 4.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
snapf.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.1 s
21/100
10%
Value4.1 s
46/100
25%
Value4.1 s
79/100
10%
Value360 ms
71/100
30%
Value0.079
94/100
15%
Value6.5 s
58/100
10%
78 ms
1006 ms
226 ms
25 ms
2296 ms
Our browser made a total of 16 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 63% of them (10 requests) were addressed to the original Snapf.com, 25% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Snapf.com.
Page size can be reduced by 185.2 kB (72%)
258.2 kB
73.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Snapf.com main page is 258.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 124.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 6.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 6.2 kB or 62% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 81.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 81.5 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 97.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Snapf.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 97.5 kB or 78% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (44%)
9
5
The browser has sent 9 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Snapf. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
snapf.com
78 ms
www.snapf.com
1006 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
226 ms
css
25 ms
genericons.css
2296 ms
style.css
1736 ms
jquery.js
2568 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1878 ms
skip-link-focus-fix.js
1201 ms
functions.js
393 ms
fVu1p3782bqS2z-CaJvp9hsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
8 ms
lJAvZoKA5NttpPc9yc6lPUnwhEOjQ2CQgMjdTKA0dzI.woff
14 ms
PIbvSEyHEdL91QLOQRnZ1xa1RVmPjeKy21_GQJaLlJI.woff
14 ms
erE3KsIWUumgD1j_Ca-V-z8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
13 ms
Genericons.svg
305 ms
8AAnjaY2BgYGQAgjO2i86D6AshzNIwGgBAmQUAAAA=
2 ms
snapf.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
snapf.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
snapf.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Snapf.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Snapf.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
snapf.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Snapf. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: