6.2 sec in total
1.7 sec
4.1 sec
446 ms
Visit snoopwall.com now to see the best up-to-date Snoopwall content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about snoopwall.com
Next Generation Intranet Security for Networks, Mobile Devices and Apps Solve Insider Threats Where The Majority Of Security Breaches Occur
Visit snoopwall.comWe analyzed Snoopwall.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.7 sec and then it took 4.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
snoopwall.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.9 s
24/100
10%
Value12.4 s
0/100
25%
Value5.1 s
61/100
10%
Value100 ms
98/100
30%
Value0.114
86/100
15%
Value7.4 s
48/100
10%
1705 ms
34 ms
15 ms
14 ms
40 ms
Our browser made a total of 89 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (78 requests) were addressed to the original Snoopwall.com, 3% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Snoopwall.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.9 MB (58%)
3.3 MB
1.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Snoopwall.com main page is 3.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 170.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 170.2 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 148.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Snoopwall needs image optimization as it can save up to 148.5 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 1.0 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.0 MB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 618.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Snoopwall.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 618.4 kB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 47 (55%)
85
38
The browser has sent 85 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Snoopwall. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 33 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.snoopwall.com
1705 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
34 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.css
15 ms
layerslider.css
14 ms
css
40 ms
styles.css
23 ms
style.css
14 ms
all-skins.css
15 ms
settings.css
22 ms
style.css
29 ms
style.css
50 ms
font-awesome.css
25 ms
animations.css
29 ms
media.css
30 ms
ipad.css
40 ms
style_login_widget.css
33 ms
jquery.js
38 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
40 ms
greensock.js
41 ms
layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js
43 ms
layerslider.transitions.js
41 ms
anything-popup.js
41 ms
flowplayer.min.js
156 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
160 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
160 ms
css
13 ms
css
26 ms
analytics.js
134 ms
liveVisitAsync.js
169 ms
logo5.svg
90 ms
dark-bg4.png
116 ms
top-50.png
114 ms
sc5.png
88 ms
big-cybersecurity500.png
109 ms
608466-3.png
148 ms
netdevice.png
112 ms
netshield_w.png
104 ms
sc-magazine.png
114 ms
stars.png
123 ms
mobileshield_w.png
111 ms
system_w.png
118 ms
main-graphic.png
122 ms
netshield2.png
119 ms
mobile-shield2.png
114 ms
appshield2.png
125 ms
guardian3.png
134 ms
dark-reading3.png
123 ms
citeworld.png
124 ms
computerworld1.png
122 ms
eweek.png
133 ms
android1.png
134 ms
yahoo.png
139 ms
networkworld1.png
132 ms
18c0254208d685b3580ffb40de74bb00_normal.png
147 ms
jquery.cycle.js
125 ms
rotating_tweet.js
122 ms
jquery.ck.min.js
123 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.js
121 ms
jquery.placeholder.js
128 ms
ninjapopups.min.js
122 ms
qppr_frontend_script.min.js
127 ms
zerospam.js
126 ms
modernizr-min.js
126 ms
jquery.carouFredSel-6.2.1-min.js
215 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto-min.js
127 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
631 ms
jquery.fitvids-min.js
144 ms
main.js
136 ms
wp-embed.min.js
129 ms
jquery.touchSwipe.min.js
128 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
135 ms
ditty-news-ticker.js
128 ms
examiner1.png
124 ms
welivesecurity.png
123 ms
twitter-bird-16x16.png
122 ms
reply.png
120 ms
retweet.png
120 ms
favorite.png
119 ms
g30.png
121 ms
collect
74 ms
ProcessStats.aspx
92 ms
icomoon.woff
72 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
169 ms
widgets.js
89 ms
collect
59 ms
tracking.js
596 ms
loader.gif
12 ms
shadow1.png
12 ms
bullet.png
12 ms
snoopwall.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
snoopwall.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
snoopwall.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Snoopwall.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Snoopwall.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
snoopwall.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Snoopwall. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: