3.8 sec in total
90 ms
3.4 sec
244 ms
Visit solarreviews.com now to see the best up-to-date Solar Reviews content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about solarreviews.com
SolarReviews is America's leading independent, unbiased, solar company and solar panel comparison website for homeowners considering installing solar panels on their homes.
Visit solarreviews.comWe analyzed Solarreviews.com page load time and found that the first response time was 90 ms and then it took 3.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
solarreviews.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.4 s
6/100
10%
Value5.4 s
20/100
25%
Value5.4 s
56/100
10%
Value1,310 ms
18/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value18.3 s
3/100
10%
90 ms
1798 ms
33 ms
57 ms
63 ms
Our browser made a total of 74 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 66% of them (49 requests) were addressed to the original Solarreviews.com, 4% (3 requests) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Solarreviews.com.
Page size can be reduced by 927.1 kB (50%)
1.8 MB
915.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Solarreviews.com main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 77.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 13.7 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 77.2 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 362.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Solar Reviews needs image optimization as it can save up to 362.5 kB or 34% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 292.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 292.1 kB or 64% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 195.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Solarreviews.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 195.2 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (43%)
68
39
The browser has sent 68 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Solar Reviews. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
solarreviews.com
90 ms
www.solarreviews.com
1798 ms
jquery.min.js
33 ms
jquery-ui.css
57 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
63 ms
bootstrap.min.css
111 ms
bootstrap-theme.min.css
102 ms
bootstrap.min.js
100 ms
static_javascript.js
100 ms
overlib.js
132 ms
tiny_mce.js
216 ms
jquery.popupWindow.js
140 ms
jquery.MetaData.js
124 ms
jquery.rating.js
160 ms
jquery.rating.css
139 ms
colorbox.css
139 ms
jquery.colorbox.js
150 ms
slick.css
169 ms
slick-theme.css
173 ms
slick.min.js
177 ms
css
54 ms
style_SR.css
212 ms
style_SR-Amanda.css
188 ms
modalpopup.js
206 ms
bootstrap-toolkit.min.js
160 ms
all.js
274 ms
widgets.js
8 ms
solarreviews.jpg
139 ms
facebook-icon.png
140 ms
twitter-icon.png
138 ms
linkedin-icon.png
41 ms
facebook-large.png
138 ms
mainbanner.jpg
140 ms
Avatar10.png
132 ms
Avatar22.png
136 ms
mit-ultrathin-solar_0.jpg
174 ms
48236340-bcc8-41ea-8b01-28b8e4af0881picture_1.jpg
189 ms
2015-policy-action-on-net-metering-rate-design-and-solar-ownership.png
305 ms
solarreservecrescentdunes.jpg
226 ms
solaire.jpg
226 ms
mc2a3247.jpg
173 ms
ev1.gif
255 ms
afford4.gif
225 ms
kopenhaver.jpg
227 ms
roc5.jpg
303 ms
16.2-kw-of-solar-panels.jpg
302 ms
fb1.jpg
260 ms
footer-SolarReviews.png
291 ms
facebook-32.png
302 ms
twitter-32.png
303 ms
linkedin-32.png
306 ms
close.png
336 ms
solar-estimate-sidebar-bg-2a.jpg
305 ms
glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff
273 ms
mlt.js
66 ms
ga.js
62 ms
button.831500944bc3eb7ea5276ccdc3f71d2e.js
47 ms
ajax-loader.gif
216 ms
solarreviews_icon2_75x75.png
215 ms
star.gif
249 ms
mlt.js
49 ms
__utm.gif
25 ms
collect
75 ms
follow_button.6a78875565a912489e9aef879c881358.en.html
33 ms
info.json
124 ms
ga-audiences
49 ms
103 ms
xd_arbiter.php
225 ms
xd_arbiter.php
428 ms
like.php
52 ms
jot
87 ms
vpc6VNjRPXV.js
486 ms
LVx-xkvaJ0b.png
548 ms
vpc6VNjRPXV.js
200 ms
solarreviews.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
solarreviews.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
solarreviews.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Solarreviews.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Solarreviews.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
solarreviews.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Solar Reviews. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: