6.7 sec in total
1.7 sec
4 sec
1.1 sec
Click here to check amazing SPB content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about spb.es
Fábrica de productos de limpieza, cuidado personal e higiene. Comercialización y fabricación de productos de calidad. ¡Infórmate!
Visit spb.esWe analyzed Spb.es page load time and found that the first response time was 1.7 sec and then it took 5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
spb.es performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value15.0 s
0/100
10%
Value15.1 s
0/100
25%
Value32.9 s
0/100
10%
Value700 ms
42/100
30%
Value0.062
97/100
15%
Value34.2 s
0/100
10%
1658 ms
1109 ms
512 ms
309 ms
504 ms
Our browser made a total of 96 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Spb.es, 13% (12 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) relates to the external source Spbglobal.com.
Page size can be reduced by 2.2 MB (37%)
5.9 MB
3.7 MB
In fact, the total size of Spb.es main page is 5.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 3.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 161.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 161.0 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 77.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. SPB images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 914.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 914.2 kB or 62% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.0 MB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Spb.es needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.0 MB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 45 (56%)
81
36
The browser has sent 81 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of SPB. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.spbglobal.com
1658 ms
main.css
1109 ms
style.min.css
512 ms
classic-themes.min.css
309 ms
styles.css
504 ms
styles.css
307 ms
css
30 ms
font-awesome.css
415 ms
elegant-font.css
403 ms
style.css
407 ms
page-builder.css
906 ms
rs6.css
612 ms
job-listings.css
516 ms
style.min.css
516 ms
style.min.css
606 ms
cookieblocker.min.css
616 ms
style-core.css
819 ms
gdlr-style-custom.css
850 ms
style.css
713 ms
jquery.min.js
817 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
815 ms
rbtools.min.js
1118 ms
rs6.min.js
1109 ms
script.min.js
920 ms
css
13 ms
index.js
652 ms
index.js
706 ms
script.js
1231 ms
page-builder.js
894 ms
effect.min.js
810 ms
jquery.mmenu.js
810 ms
jquery.superfish.js
893 ms
script-core.js
950 ms
api.js
101 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
950 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
950 ms
index.js
951 ms
complianz.min.js
1002 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
280 ms
spb-logogrey.png
173 ms
es.png
185 ms
en.png
185 ms
de.png
240 ms
fr.png
271 ms
language-white.png
271 ms
spb-logo-1.png
274 ms
slide01.jpg
483 ms
SPB_Home_Short_2.jpeg
322 ms
slide04.jpg
363 ms
slide05.jpg
688 ms
ico-cuidadodelhogar.png
482 ms
ico-cuidado-personal.png
483 ms
ico-higiene-1.png
540 ms
bg-video-home-responsive.jpg
541 ms
ico-privatelabel-1.png
541 ms
ico-contract-manufacturing.png
541 ms
logo-voyetre2-1.jpg
541 ms
spb-brands-voyetre.jpg
612 ms
logo-elantia.jpg
610 ms
spb-brands-elantia.jpg
611 ms
porque-escogernos.png
612 ms
presencia-internacional-spb-scaled.jpg
685 ms
05-SPB_-127-900x500.jpg
688 ms
Recorte-3-Auditoria-RSPO-900x500.jpg
706 ms
recorte-portada-anuario-SPB.png
706 ms
S1_0007-900x500.jpg
674 ms
IMG_0443-recorte-para-web-900x500.jpg
701 ms
MicrosoftTeams-image-135-900x500.jpg
698 ms
05-SPB_-103-900x500.jpg
698 ms
David-Escribano.png
701 ms
image00018-900x500.jpeg
705 ms
ico-in.svg
652 ms
S6uyw4BMUTPHjxAwWw.ttf
37 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwaPHA.ttf
69 ms
S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AUi-v.ttf
91 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwaPHA.ttf
92 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwaPHA.ttf
93 ms
ElegantIcons.woff
684 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
725 ms
ico-tt.svg
712 ms
ico-fb.svg
738 ms
ico-yt.svg
738 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
37 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf
36 ms
bg-mapa-home.jpg
686 ms
bg-home2.jpg
669 ms
bg-desarrollamos.jpg
824 ms
bg-actualidad.jpg
734 ms
bg-industria2.jpg
687 ms
bg-footer-1.jpg
644 ms
recaptcha__en.js
94 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf
5 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVc.ttf
19 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVc.ttf
20 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVc.ttf
19 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4uaVc.ttf
22 ms
spb.es accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
spb.es best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
spb.es SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
ES
ES
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Spb.es can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Spanish is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Spb.es main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
spb.es
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of SPB. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: