8 sec in total
65 ms
7 sec
924 ms
Visit spf.church now to see the best up-to-date Spf content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about spf.church
Visit spf.churchWe analyzed Spf.church page load time and found that the first response time was 65 ms and then it took 7.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
spf.church performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.6 s
32/100
10%
Value27.0 s
0/100
25%
Value17.4 s
0/100
10%
Value4,880 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.193
64/100
15%
Value12.0 s
16/100
10%
65 ms
3514 ms
668 ms
668 ms
425 ms
Our browser made a total of 73 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 74% of them (54 requests) were addressed to the original Spf.church, 10% (7 requests) were made to Youtube.com and 8% (6 requests) were made to Jnn-pa.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Spf.church.
Page size can be reduced by 726.7 kB (35%)
2.1 MB
1.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Spf.church main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 31.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 31.1 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 109.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Spf needs image optimization as it can save up to 109.4 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 307.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 307.8 kB or 52% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 278.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Spf.church needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 278.4 kB or 71% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 38 (58%)
66
28
The browser has sent 66 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Spf. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
spf.church
65 ms
spf.church
3514 ms
sparky_frontend.css
668 ms
template.min.css
668 ms
template.css
425 ms
css2
27 ms
normalize.css
470 ms
bootstrap.min.css
349 ms
sparky-id27-230823120110.css
479 ms
style.css
813 ms
style.css
715 ms
core.min.js
702 ms
bootstrap-es5.min.js
908 ms
sparky_frontend.js
968 ms
jquery.min.js
1158 ms
sparky_animation.js
1001 ms
jquery-noconflict.min.js
1173 ms
alert.min.js
1140 ms
button.min.js
1155 ms
carousel.min.js
1172 ms
collapse.min.js
1164 ms
dropdown.min.js
1197 ms
modal.min.js
1181 ms
offcanvas.min.js
1189 ms
popover.min.js
1220 ms
scrollspy.min.js
1229 ms
tab.min.js
1220 ms
toast.min.js
1219 ms
menu.min.js
1386 ms
behaviour.js
1420 ms
sparky-id27-230823120110.js
1464 ms
flickity.pkgd.min.js
1555 ms
responsive-nav.min.js
1474 ms
sparky-footer-id27-230823120110.js
1467 ms
fontawesome.min.css
1168 ms
spf_log.png
675 ms
slide1.jpg
875 ms
slide2.jpg
240 ms
slide3.jpg
869 ms
photo_2023-08-23_12-22-28.jpg
766 ms
found.jpg
870 ms
Picture1.jpg
1009 ms
1f.jpg
1012 ms
WhatsApp%20Image%202024-03-01%20at%2015.19.51_972b1b52.jpg
1011 ms
injili.jpg
1327 ms
SPF%20%20%20logo%20live.png
1233 ms
3b.jpg
1136 ms
logo1.png
1297 ms
font
73 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
1599 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
1500 ms
0TA4f2s0JAE
181 ms
X2HLxbqG0yg
566 ms
B1oaQgWyAWw
624 ms
row_background3.jpg
1577 ms
row_background2.jpg
1389 ms
footer_bg.jpg
1597 ms
code
569 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
1589 ms
tinynav.png
1424 ms
www-player.css
16 ms
www-embed-player.js
37 ms
base.js
64 ms
ad_status.js
374 ms
odCoDBU9oV91s5dR-LaYbLEhfvL19F60bn5h6Uq-Zz0.js
364 ms
embed.js
273 ms
id
47 ms
Create
139 ms
Create
143 ms
Create
267 ms
GenerateIT
118 ms
GenerateIT
118 ms
GenerateIT
31 ms
spf.church accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
spf.church best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
spf.church SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Spf.church can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Spf.church main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
spf.church
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Spf. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: