15.6 sec in total
3.8 sec
11.6 sec
210 ms
Visit squeezepagetoolkit.com now to see the best up-to-date Squeeze Page Toolkit content for United Kingdom and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about squeezepagetoolkit.com
Visit squeezepagetoolkit.comWe analyzed Squeezepagetoolkit.com page load time and found that the first response time was 3.8 sec and then it took 11.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
squeezepagetoolkit.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.1 s
21/100
10%
Value7.0 s
6/100
25%
Value7.8 s
24/100
10%
Value1,380 ms
16/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value9.5 s
30/100
10%
3805 ms
20 ms
191 ms
205 ms
367 ms
Our browser made a total of 87 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 23% of them (20 requests) were addressed to the original Squeezepagetoolkit.com, 9% (8 requests) were made to Cm.g.doubleclick.net and 8% (7 requests) were made to Dsum-sec.casalemedia.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Squeezepagetoolkit.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (66%)
1.7 MB
567.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Squeezepagetoolkit.com main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 992.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 200.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 200.5 kB or 90% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 4.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Squeeze Page Toolkit images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 723.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 723.5 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 172.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Squeezepagetoolkit.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 172.9 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 53 (77%)
69
16
The browser has sent 69 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Squeeze Page Toolkit. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.squeezepagetoolkit.com
3805 ms
shareaholic.js
20 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
191 ms
style.css
205 ms
bootstrap.css
367 ms
app.css
228 ms
font-awesome.min.css
324 ms
jquery.js
385 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
226 ms
modernizr-2.6.2.min.js
398 ms
plugins.js
408 ms
main.js
412 ms
css
24 ms
jstree.min.js
531 ms
jstree.state.js
579 ms
public.js
579 ms
wp-embed.min.js
580 ms
0f9e091b2ed8cdc47c12415d799af4f4.json
31 ms
ga.js
25 ms
fbds.js
167 ms
j.php
43 ms
squeeze-page-toolkit.png
285 ms
frt_johnlamerton.jpg
343 ms
em_emmamelhuish.jpg
345 ms
pj_mitchlloyd.jpg
346 ms
cp_vanessald.jpg
365 ms
dndeditor.png
615 ms
__utm.gif
79 ms
eXTLMlW5_yOhUYbVCO_akg.ttf
68 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
20 ms
v.gif
27 ms
shrMain.min.js
33 ms
jquery.min.js
36 ms
95 ms
analytics.js
79 ms
pageview.gif
24 ms
vglnk.js
15 ms
partners.js
43 ms
pixel.gif
19 ms
pixel.gif
17 ms
sholic.js
9 ms
usermatch
52 ms
beacon.js
25 ms
cms-sh2c.html
77 ms
eexelate.js
16 ms
99 ms
ep
15 ms
57 ms
usermatch
22 ms
gr
93 ms
pixel
108 ms
VvO9JsAoJUUAAYlItCQAAABp%26610
242 ms
i.gif
217 ms
pixelssl.htm
154 ms
ping_match.gif
53 ms
net.php
36 ms
2964
152 ms
generic
23 ms
pixel
51 ms
casale
18 ms
crum
101 ms
generic
33 ms
pixel
73 ms
crum
111 ms
pixel
52 ms
rs
30 ms
pixel
39 ms
pixel
48 ms
pixel
34 ms
rum
110 ms
xrefid.xgi
25 ms
rum
96 ms
crum
87 ms
ddcssl.htm
96 ms
m
97 ms
pixel
71 ms
pixel.gif
66 ms
pixel.gif
48 ms
match-result
59 ms
crum
18 ms
ermcm
32 ms
xrefid.xgi
4 ms
crum
11 ms
ping
21 ms
domains
47 ms
home_ebook.png
553 ms
3 ms
squeezepagetoolkit.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
squeezepagetoolkit.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
squeezepagetoolkit.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Squeezepagetoolkit.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Squeezepagetoolkit.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
squeezepagetoolkit.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Squeeze Page Toolkit. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: