9.6 sec in total
3.9 sec
5.5 sec
199 ms
Click here to check amazing Stackhow content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about stackhow.com
Questions & Answers
Visit stackhow.comWe analyzed Stackhow.com page load time and found that the first response time was 3.9 sec and then it took 5.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
stackhow.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.6 s
63/100
10%
Value4.0 s
50/100
25%
Value4.7 s
69/100
10%
Value450 ms
62/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value8.4 s
39/100
10%
3905 ms
23 ms
74 ms
72 ms
129 ms
Our browser made a total of 112 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (75 requests) were addressed to the original Stackhow.com, 4% (5 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 4% (4 requests) were made to Tpc.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Stackhow.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (68%)
1.7 MB
524.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Stackhow.com main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 107.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 21.6 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 107.4 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 32.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Stackhow needs image optimization as it can save up to 32.2 kB or 84% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 694.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 694.7 kB or 63% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 296.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Stackhow.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 296.1 kB or 77% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 90 (85%)
106
16
The browser has sent 106 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Stackhow. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 74 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
stackhow.com
3905 ms
css
23 ms
selectivizr-min.js
74 ms
jetpack.css
72 ms
bootstrap.min.css
129 ms
font-awesome.min.css
100 ms
main.css
138 ms
editor.css
98 ms
push-menu.css
109 ms
chosen.css
109 ms
custom.css
143 ms
style.css
157 ms
jquery.js
182 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
147 ms
plupload.full.min.js
254 ms
adsbygoogle.js
43 ms
dashicons.min.css
197 ms
editor.min.css
165 ms
photon.js
164 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
10 ms
gprofiles.js
119 ms
wpgroho.js
170 ms
underscore.min.js
187 ms
backbone.min.js
188 ms
appengine.js
200 ms
functions.js
215 ms
bootstrap.min.js
354 ms
modernizr.js
354 ms
jquery.simple-text-rotator.min.js
354 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
355 ms
core.min.js
356 ms
widget.min.js
355 ms
position.min.js
356 ms
menu.min.js
357 ms
autocomplete.min.js
359 ms
waypoints.min.js
356 ms
waypoints-sticky.js
359 ms
chosen.jquery.min.js
361 ms
classie.js
360 ms
scripts.js
359 ms
e-201613.js
4 ms
front.js
355 ms
facebookauth.js
334 ms
googleauth.js
321 ms
utils.min.js
315 ms
editor.min.js
476 ms
wplink.min.js
307 ms
tinymce.min.js
599 ms
plugin.min.js
439 ms
wp-langs-en.js
433 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
432 ms
24c89d4ec847a2f6e433f790612427e7
121 ms
stackhow.png
342 ms
ca-pub-0427861165788810.js
291 ms
zrt_lookup.html
289 ms
show_ads_impl.js
188 ms
4GwpJM7qx9X5Obd9KsnKxQ.ttf
167 ms
zpv3sOKAbMf4wff105oLjw.ttf
265 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
466 ms
ads
411 ms
all.js
212 ms
client:plusone.js
210 ms
osd.js
31 ms
hovercard.css
141 ms
services.css
144 ms
ads
775 ms
editor_plugin_src.js
99 ms
editor_plugin.js
100 ms
editor_plugin.js
97 ms
plugin.min.js
97 ms
theme.min.js
100 ms
plugin.min.js
97 ms
plugin.min.js
181 ms
plugin.min.js
101 ms
plugin.min.js
191 ms
plugin.min.js
196 ms
plugin.min.js
192 ms
plugin.min.js
190 ms
plugin.min.js
188 ms
plugin.min.js
231 ms
plugin.min.js
235 ms
plugin.min.js
236 ms
plugin.min.js
236 ms
plugin.min.js
243 ms
plugin.min.js
262 ms
plugin.min.js
293 ms
plugin.min.js
292 ms
plugin.min.js
292 ms
plugin.min.js
292 ms
plugin.min.js
294 ms
g.gif
19 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
34 ms
93 ms
postmessageRelay
74 ms
xd_arbiter.php
195 ms
xd_arbiter.php
318 ms
m_js_controller.js
48 ms
abg.js
63 ms
3193398744-postmessagerelay.js
54 ms
rpc:shindig_random.js
31 ms
favicon
120 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
119 ms
nessie_icon_tiamat_white.png
32 ms
s
23 ms
x_button_blue2.png
12 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
80 ms
skin.min.css
134 ms
content.min.css
112 ms
editor_content.css
110 ms
F5EcQNuXvzCwnROrenDy46C3KsouVqfn29hTt0MreZk.js
4 ms
css
34 ms
v0SdcGFAl2aezM9Vq_aFTQ.ttf
5 ms
stackhow.com accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
stackhow.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
stackhow.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Page is blocked from indexing
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Stackhow.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Stackhow.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
stackhow.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Stackhow. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: