Report Summary

  • 70

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    81% of other websites

  • 42

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 18% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 58

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    20% of websites

standerton.com

WELCOME TO STANDERTON.COM the Global Website for Standerton, Sakhile, Lekwa in Mpumalanga Province South Africa

Page Load Speed

3.2 sec in total

First Response

395 ms

Resources Loaded

1.4 sec

Page Rendered

1.3 sec

standerton.com screenshot

About Website

Visit standerton.com now to see the best up-to-date STANDERTON content for South Africa and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about standerton.com

The Global Website for Standerton, Sakhile and Lekwa in South Africa providing information,promotional and advertising services for businesses and residents in Lekwa municipality & community,which is ...

Visit standerton.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Standerton.com page load time and found that the first response time was 395 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

standerton.com performance score

70

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.0 s

85/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.4 s

89/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value170 ms

93/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.018

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.3 s

99/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

standerton.com

395 ms

vanslife_back52.jpg

82 ms

flag73.gif

81 ms

slide-gif.gif

124 ms

earth.gif

168 ms

Our browser made a total of 82 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 95% of them (78 requests) were addressed to the original Standerton.com, 2% (2 requests) were made to Google.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Simplehitcounter.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (915 ms) belongs to the original domain Standerton.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 119.8 kB (11%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

1.0 MB

In fact, the total size of Standerton.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-91%

Potential reduce by 86.3 kB

  • Original 95.1 kB
  • After minification 60.3 kB
  • After compression 8.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 34.8 kB, which is 37% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 86.3 kB or 91% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 33.5 kB

  • Original 1.0 MB
  • After minification 1.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. STANDERTON images are well optimized though.

CSS Optimization

-24%

Potential reduce by 77 B

  • Original 322 B
  • After minification 322 B
  • After compression 245 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Standerton.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 77 B or 24% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

80

After Optimization

80

The browser has sent 80 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of STANDERTON. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

standerton.com accessibility score

42

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

standerton.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

SEO Factors

standerton.com SEO score

58

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    WINDOWS-1252

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Standerton.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Standerton.com main page’s claimed encoding is windows-1252. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of STANDERTON. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: