Report Summary

  • 100

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    97% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 77% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 67

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    25% of websites

starreviews.com

IIS Windows Server

Page Load Speed

4.9 sec in total

First Response

142 ms

Resources Loaded

3.9 sec

Page Rendered

917 ms

starreviews.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to starreviews.com homepage info - get ready to check Starreviews best content right away, or after learning these important things about starreviews.com

Reviews and Side by Side Comparisons of Personal financial and business services and websites.

Visit starreviews.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Starreviews.com page load time and found that the first response time was 142 ms and then it took 4.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

starreviews.com performance score

100

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0.6 s

100/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.2 s

100/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value0.6 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value0.6 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

starreviews.com

142 ms

www.starreviews.com

1969 ms

style.css

152 ms

pin-style.css

166 ms

jquery.min.js

34 ms

Our browser made a total of 73 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 33% of them (24 requests) were addressed to the original Starreviews.com, 11% (8 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 7% (5 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) belongs to the original domain Starreviews.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 252.7 kB (33%)

Content Size

775.3 kB

After Optimization

522.7 kB

In fact, the total size of Starreviews.com main page is 775.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 464.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 97.5 kB

  • Original 125.0 kB
  • After minification 122.2 kB
  • After compression 27.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 97.5 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 31.6 kB

  • Original 464.9 kB
  • After minification 433.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Starreviews images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 109.7 kB

  • Original 168.2 kB
  • After minification 161.7 kB
  • After compression 58.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 109.7 kB or 65% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 13.8 kB

  • Original 17.2 kB
  • After minification 12.2 kB
  • After compression 3.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Starreviews.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 13.8 kB or 80% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 40 (57%)

Requests Now

70

After Optimization

30

The browser has sent 70 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Starreviews. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 33 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

starreviews.com accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

starreviews.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

SEO Factors

starreviews.com SEO score

67

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Starreviews.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Starreviews.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Starreviews. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: