12.8 sec in total
303 ms
7.6 sec
4.9 sec
Click here to check amazing Starwalt content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about starwalt.com
Home page with artist statement
Visit starwalt.comWe analyzed Starwalt.com page load time and found that the first response time was 303 ms and then it took 12.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
starwalt.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value9.6 s
0/100
10%
Value11.3 s
0/100
25%
Value9.6 s
11/100
10%
Value960 ms
29/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value11.3 s
19/100
10%
303 ms
279 ms
553 ms
258 ms
257 ms
Our browser made a total of 18 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Starwalt.com, 17% (3 requests) were made to Ginastartupart.com and 11% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) relates to the external source P.typekit.net.
Page size can be reduced by 209.0 kB (12%)
1.7 MB
1.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Starwalt.com main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 39.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.5 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 39.3 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 12.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Starwalt images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 105.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 105.3 kB or 51% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 52.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Starwalt.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 52.3 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (30%)
10
7
The browser has sent 10 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Starwalt. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
ginastartupart.com
303 ms
main.css
279 ms
929992d1651e19b7c5db0b2e720547de1504547242.css
553 ms
yFGitrFDXmrfr-shgOCaFTz8NdcZzOKxp2XBt4bd1n3fen9ffHYEBsJzwD9oFDIDWDbtZAbhFRSt5QjDFAJX5QwuF2ByjDZcZeBywhJDZQBRFDMDZQFK52S-86I7OciTdcBDieBkiYm3jW4XOcFzdP37OcuoSeNkieZzde8zOcFzdP37O1gkdDJlic88ikolpWgzS1scdhUTdkoRdhXCZh80jWFXjW4XiWgyS1b0jhNlOeuoSeNkieZzde8zOcFzdPU3ScvkOWZTZWS0dW83da4XZcNC-Av0jhNlOYiaiko1-AoySasyS1suSeBkifoRdhXKgeilShGKgYgnpWGKgYZRShX7fbR5FsMMeMb6MPG4fFIVIMMjgkMgH6GJ0iCgIMIjgfMgH6qJCMIbMy65JMI7fbKzMsMfeMb6MPG4fHXgIMJjgKMgH6qJK3IbMy6YJMebMdEeGSXB.js
258 ms
main.js
257 ms
analytics.js
807 ms
collect
145 ms
d
903 ms
d
1224 ms
d
1539 ms
d
1555 ms
d
1555 ms
d
1555 ms
d
1555 ms
p.gif
1894 ms
6e9d7088-4d67-4caa-bf07-a7f7ea7b1653_rw_1920.jpg
1550 ms
052f11e7-9ecb-4e0f-9293-c5510843133f_rw_1920.jpg
1503 ms
nr-1044.min.js
87 ms
starwalt.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
starwalt.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
starwalt.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Starwalt.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Starwalt.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
starwalt.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Starwalt. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: