964 ms in total
107 ms
771 ms
86 ms
Visit staywell.shapeup.com now to see the best up-to-date Staywell Shapeup content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about staywell.shapeup.com
Rajiv Kumar, MD: Digital health entrepreneur, angel investor, startup advisor
Visit staywell.shapeup.comWe analyzed Staywell.shapeup.com page load time and found that the first response time was 107 ms and then it took 857 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.
staywell.shapeup.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.2 s
78/100
10%
Value3.5 s
63/100
25%
Value3.0 s
94/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value2.2 s
99/100
10%
107 ms
320 ms
68 ms
91 ms
85 ms
Our browser made a total of 30 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 7% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Staywell.shapeup.com, 53% (16 requests) were made to S3.amazonaws.com and 30% (9 requests) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (320 ms) belongs to the original domain Staywell.shapeup.com.
Page size can be reduced by 448.8 kB (79%)
567.8 kB
119.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Staywell.shapeup.com main page is 567.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 451.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 21.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 21.8 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 505 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Staywell Shapeup needs image optimization as it can save up to 505 B or 28% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 42.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 42.6 kB or 52% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 383.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Staywell.shapeup.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 383.8 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (73%)
26
7
The browser has sent 26 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Staywell Shapeup. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
staywell.shapeup.com
107 ms
staywell.shapeup.com
320 ms
screen.css
68 ms
custom.css
91 ms
prototype.js
85 ms
scriptaculous.js
96 ms
swfobject.js
110 ms
shapeup.js
90 ms
libraries.js
84 ms
analytics.js
33 ms
reset.css
16 ms
grid.css
36 ms
bloat.css
28 ms
dev.css
38 ms
master.css
66 ms
ie.css
35 ms
builder.js
11 ms
effects.js
12 ms
dragdrop.js
24 ms
controls.js
22 ms
slider.js
30 ms
sound.js
34 ms
powered_by_shapeup.png
23 ms
shapeup_uiprovider.js
21 ms
hide.png
19 ms
ajax-loader.gif
20 ms
ajax-loader-1.gif
19 ms
collect
12 ms
OpenSans-Regular-webfont.woff
11 ms
nr-885.min.js
93 ms
staywell.shapeup.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
staywell.shapeup.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
staywell.shapeup.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Staywell.shapeup.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Staywell.shapeup.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
staywell.shapeup.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Staywell Shapeup. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: