1.1 sec in total
168 ms
796 ms
154 ms
Visit steppingstonenextstep.org now to see the best up-to-date Stepping Stone Nextstep content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about steppingstonenextstep.org
Stepping Stone, Claremont
Visit steppingstonenextstep.orgWe analyzed Steppingstonenextstep.org page load time and found that the first response time was 168 ms and then it took 950 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.
steppingstonenextstep.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.3 s
40/100
10%
Value3.4 s
67/100
25%
Value3.3 s
91/100
10%
Value50 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value3.7 s
90/100
10%
168 ms
90 ms
39 ms
91 ms
97 ms
Our browser made a total of 21 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 24% of them (5 requests) were addressed to the original Steppingstonenextstep.org, 67% (14 requests) were made to Cdn.initial-website.com and 10% (2 requests) were made to 202.sb.mywebsite-editor.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (253 ms) relates to the external source Cdn.initial-website.com.
Page size can be reduced by 58.8 kB (21%)
277.2 kB
218.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Steppingstonenextstep.org main page is 277.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 199.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 25.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 25.9 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 12.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Stepping Stone Nextstep images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 18.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 18.9 kB or 49% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Steppingstonenextstep.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.9 kB or 29% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (60%)
20
8
The browser has sent 20 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Stepping Stone Nextstep. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.steppingstonenextstep.org
168 ms
style.css
90 ms
theming.css
39 ms
web.css
91 ms
common,shoppingbasket
97 ms
mobilenavigation.css
99 ms
logstate2-css.php
167 ms
logstate-js.php
169 ms
web.js
253 ms
web.bundle.js
96 ms
mobilenavigation.js
123 ms
common,shoppingbasket
185 ms
241 ms
pfcsupport.js
131 ms
background.gif
50 ms
emotionheader.jpg
182 ms
print.css
37 ms
cache_4229701733.png
62 ms
pdf.png
32 ms
printer.gif
32 ms
logo.gif
32 ms
steppingstonenextstep.org accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
steppingstonenextstep.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
steppingstonenextstep.org SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
robots.txt is not valid
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Steppingstonenextstep.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Steppingstonenextstep.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
steppingstonenextstep.org
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Stepping Stone Nextstep. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: