Tools & Wizards About Us
stereotool.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 27

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    47% of other websites

  • 70

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 36% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    56% of websites

stereotool.com

Stereo Tool - Thimeo

Page Load Speed

1.6 sec in total

First Response

308 ms

Resources Loaded

601 ms

Page Rendered

672 ms

stereotool.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to stereotool.com homepage info - get ready to check Stereo Tool best content for Netherlands right away, or after learning these important things about stereotool.com

Stereo Tool

Visit stereotool.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Stereotool.com page load time and found that the first response time was 308 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

stereotool.com performance score

27

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.2 s

78/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value31.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.9 s

6/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value500 ms

58/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.661

8/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value31.5 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

stereotool.com

308 ms

bg.gif

140 ms

latest.html

139 ms

logo-benliebrand.png

182 ms

stereo_tool_700-1.png

221 ms

Our browser made a total of 9 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 78% of them (7 requests) were addressed to the original Stereotool.com, 11% (1 request) were made to S10.sitemeter.com and 11% (1 request) were made to B10.sitemeter.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (335 ms) belongs to the original domain Stereotool.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 36.3 kB (10%)

Content Size

354.2 kB

After Optimization

317.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images

In fact, the total size of Stereotool.com main page is 354.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 328.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 19.3 kB

  • Original 25.4 kB
  • After minification 23.0 kB
  • After compression 6.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 19.3 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 17.1 kB

  • Original 328.8 kB
  • After minification 311.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Stereo Tool images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

7

After Optimization

7

  • AJAX
  • Images

The browser has sent 7 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Stereo Tool. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

stereotool.com

stereotool.com

308 ms

bg.gif

bg.gif

140 ms

latest.html

latest.html

139 ms

logo-benliebrand.png

logo-benliebrand.png

182 ms

stereo_tool_700-1.png

stereo_tool_700-1.png

221 ms

stereo_tool_700-3.png

stereo_tool_700-3.png

284 ms

stereo_tool_700-2.png

stereo_tool_700-2.png

335 ms

meter.asp

meter.asp

9 ms

meter.asp

meter.asp

11 ms

Accessibility Review

stereotool.com accessibility score

70

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

stereotool.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

stereotool.com SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Stereotool.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Stereotool.com main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

stereotool.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Stereo Tool. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: