Report Summary

  • 100

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    97% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 60% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 75

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    32% of websites

stickfight.net

stickfight: whoops!

Page Load Speed

888 ms in total

First Response

229 ms

Resources Loaded

511 ms

Page Rendered

148 ms

stickfight.net screenshot

About Website

Visit stickfight.net now to see the best up-to-date Stickfight content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about stickfight.net

description here. possibly.

Visit stickfight.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Stickfight.net page load time and found that the first response time was 229 ms and then it took 659 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

stickfight.net performance score

100

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0.9 s

100/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.4 s

100/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value0.9 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value0.9 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

stickfight.net

229 ms

default-main.css

71 ms

site.js

70 ms

sf-back.png

72 ms

sf.png

140 ms

Our browser made a total of 5 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Stickfight.net and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (229 ms) belongs to the original domain Stickfight.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 14.9 kB (79%)

Content Size

18.9 kB

After Optimization

4.0 kB

In fact, the total size of Stickfight.net main page is 18.9 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only 5% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 9.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 2.0 kB

  • Original 3.1 kB
  • After minification 2.4 kB
  • After compression 1.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 746 B, which is 24% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 2.0 kB or 65% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 7.9 kB

  • Original 9.9 kB
  • After minification 7.7 kB
  • After compression 2.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 7.9 kB or 80% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 5.1 kB

  • Original 5.9 kB
  • After minification 3.9 kB
  • After compression 872 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Stickfight.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 5.1 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

4

After Optimization

4

The browser has sent 4 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Stickfight. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

stickfight.net accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

stickfight.net best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

SEO Factors

stickfight.net SEO score

75

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    WINDOWS-1252

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Stickfight.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Stickfight.net main page’s claimed encoding is windows-1252. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Stickfight. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: