Tools & Wizards About Us
stonecuttercapital.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 43

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    62% of other websites

  • 92

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

stonecuttercapital.com

Stonecutter Capital Management, LLC

Page Load Speed

635 ms in total

First Response

27 ms

Resources Loaded

415 ms

Page Rendered

193 ms

stonecuttercapital.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Stonecutter Capital content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about stonecuttercapital.com

Visit stonecuttercapital.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Stonecuttercapital.com page load time and found that the first response time was 27 ms and then it took 608 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

stonecuttercapital.com performance score

43

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.2 s

77/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.5 s

4/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.1 s

92/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,110 ms

23/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.5 s

30/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

stonecuttercapital.com

27 ms

www.stonecuttercapital.com

201 ms

style.min.css

10 ms

styles.css

24 ms

bootstrap.min.css

24 ms

Our browser made a total of 24 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (22 requests) were addressed to the original Stonecuttercapital.com, 4% (1 request) were made to Google.com and 4% (1 request) were made to Gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (201 ms) belongs to the original domain Stonecuttercapital.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 339.0 kB (23%)

Content Size

1.5 MB

After Optimization

1.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Stonecuttercapital.com main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 799.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 20.6 kB

  • Original 26.7 kB
  • After minification 26.1 kB
  • After compression 6.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 20.6 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 15.0 kB

  • Original 799.0 kB
  • After minification 784.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Stonecutter Capital images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-50%

Potential reduce by 303.1 kB

  • Original 608.3 kB
  • After minification 608.3 kB
  • After compression 305.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 303.1 kB or 50% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 328 B

  • Original 59.8 kB
  • After minification 59.8 kB
  • After compression 59.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Stonecuttercapital.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (68%)

Requests Now

22

After Optimization

7

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 22 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Stonecutter Capital. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

stonecuttercapital.com

stonecuttercapital.com

27 ms

www.stonecuttercapital.com

www.stonecuttercapital.com

201 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

10 ms

styles.css

styles.css

24 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

24 ms

bootstrap-grid.min.css

bootstrap-grid.min.css

41 ms

stonecuttercapital.min.css

stonecuttercapital.min.css

35 ms

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

51 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

57 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

53 ms

scripts.min.js

scripts.min.js

53 ms

index.js

index.js

52 ms

index.js

index.js

52 ms

api.js

api.js

79 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

52 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

78 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

77 ms

index.js

index.js

53 ms

stonecutter_web_01-e1676990598185.png

stonecutter_web_01-e1676990598185.png

22 ms

stonecutter_web_09.png

stonecutter_web_09.png

25 ms

stonecutter_web_10-e1677076905758.png

stonecutter_web_10-e1677076905758.png

24 ms

stonecutter_web_11-e1677076793257.png

stonecutter_web_11-e1677076793257.png

23 ms

stonecutter_web_12-e1677076987475.png

stonecutter_web_12-e1677076987475.png

24 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

38 ms

Accessibility Review

stonecuttercapital.com accessibility score

92

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[role] values are not valid

Best Practices

stonecuttercapital.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

stonecuttercapital.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Stonecuttercapital.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Stonecuttercapital.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

stonecuttercapital.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Stonecutter Capital. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: