4.3 sec in total
416 ms
3.1 sec
739 ms
Visit stonehand.com now to see the best up-to-date Stonehand content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about stonehand.com
Home improvement, architectural and interior design magazine - Stonehand, your source for guide and tips to improve and transform your home.
Visit stonehand.comWe analyzed Stonehand.com page load time and found that the first response time was 416 ms and then it took 3.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
stonehand.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.6 s
13/100
10%
Value4.8 s
30/100
25%
Value8.9 s
15/100
10%
Value270 ms
82/100
30%
Value0.097
90/100
15%
Value11.3 s
19/100
10%
416 ms
71 ms
38 ms
156 ms
426 ms
Our browser made a total of 62 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 68% of them (42 requests) were addressed to the original Stonehand.com, 10% (6 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 5% (3 requests) were made to Assets.pinterest.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (705 ms) belongs to the original domain Stonehand.com.
Page size can be reduced by 102.4 kB (15%)
688.7 kB
586.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Stonehand.com main page is 688.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 461.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 39.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 39.8 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 23.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Stonehand images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 29.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 29.5 kB or 20% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 9.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Stonehand.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 9.9 kB or 37% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (59%)
58
24
The browser has sent 58 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Stonehand. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.stonehand.com
416 ms
style.css
71 ms
css
38 ms
ppibfi_pinterest.css
156 ms
styles.css
426 ms
wp-socializer.min.css
152 ms
font-awesome.min.css
131 ms
socializer.min.css
147 ms
shortcodes.css
154 ms
font-awesome.min.css
151 ms
custom.css
153 ms
wzslider.css
207 ms
jquery.js
325 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
197 ms
ppibfi_pinterest.js
195 ms
init.js
195 ms
platform.js
138 ms
pinit.js
45 ms
scripts.js
405 ms
colorbox.min.js
252 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
252 ms
dropdown.js
259 ms
app.js
309 ms
galleria.js
373 ms
wzslider.js
320 ms
wp-embed.min.js
372 ms
wp-socializer.min.js
372 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
274 ms
pinit_fg_en_round_red_16.png
38 ms
rss_small.png
81 ms
home-design-620x250.jpg
82 ms
white-interior-decorating-600x250.jpg
488 ms
bedroom-featured-620x250.jpg
165 ms
traditional-old-world-bedroom-620x250.jpg
488 ms
Murphy-bed-featured3.jpg
114 ms
cedar-deck-140x85.jpg
173 ms
nature-nursery-theme-1-140x85.jpg
173 ms
diy-captains-bed-1-140x85.jpg
174 ms
top-captains-bed-140x85.jpg
486 ms
big-bed-small-bedroom-140x85.jpg
485 ms
Murphy-bed-with-cabinets-140x85.jpg
484 ms
outdoor-furniture-covers-140x85.jpg
534 ms
more-floor-space-140x85.jpg
535 ms
tuscany-replacement-window.jpg
705 ms
modernbeddingset.jpg
687 ms
sdk.js
36 ms
widgets.js
94 ms
counter.js
49 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
179 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
177 ms
fastbutton
325 ms
sdk.js
410 ms
t.php
630 ms
loading2.gif
366 ms
controls.png
365 ms
arrows.png
366 ms
pinit_main.js
382 ms
postmessageRelay
460 ms
developers.google.com
370 ms
1832714284-postmessagerelay.js
32 ms
rpc:shindig_random.js
13 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
6 ms
stonehand.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
stonehand.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
stonehand.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Stonehand.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Stonehand.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
stonehand.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Stonehand. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: