1.9 sec in total
157 ms
1.5 sec
257 ms
Click here to check amazing Stringletter content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about stringletter.com
Media, Intel, Ideas
Visit stringletter.comWe analyzed Stringletter.com page load time and found that the first response time was 157 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
stringletter.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.1 s
21/100
10%
Value5.0 s
28/100
25%
Value5.3 s
58/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.246
51/100
15%
Value4.1 s
86/100
10%
157 ms
44 ms
82 ms
94 ms
95 ms
Our browser made a total of 54 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 72% of them (39 requests) were addressed to the original Stringletter.com, 6% (3 requests) were made to Fast.wistia.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (988 ms) belongs to the original domain Stringletter.com.
Page size can be reduced by 456.6 kB (38%)
1.2 MB
754.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Stringletter.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 583.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 33.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 33.5 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 35.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Stringletter images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 286.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 286.9 kB or 49% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 100.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Stringletter.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 100.6 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 32 (63%)
51
19
The browser has sent 51 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Stringletter. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
stringletter.com
157 ms
style.css
44 ms
farbtastic.css
82 ms
thickbox.css
94 ms
style.css
95 ms
stylesheet.css
89 ms
css
24 ms
colorbox.css
95 ms
default.min.css
98 ms
jetpack.css
118 ms
jquery.js
872 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
866 ms
quicktags.min.js
811 ms
editor_plugin.js
830 ms
E-v1%2Csocialbar-v1%2CpostRoll-v1.js
124 ms
E-v1.js
124 ms
classic-10_7.css
11 ms
mc-validate.js
22 ms
thickbox.js
857 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
6 ms
widget.min.js
842 ms
respond.min.js
980 ms
jquery.flexslider.min.js
979 ms
jquery.form.min.js
979 ms
responsiveslides.min.js
982 ms
fitvids.min.js
979 ms
jquery.slides.min.js
980 ms
doubletaptogo.min.js
981 ms
scripts.js
982 ms
jquery.colorbox-min.js
981 ms
wp-embed.min.js
988 ms
e-201611.js
4 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
941 ms
iframe_shim
67 ms
analytics.js
51 ms
logo4.png
188 ms
nav_icons.png
104 ms
stringletter-header-980px.jpg
176 ms
Dwight_Yoakam-640x360.jpg
109 ms
james-hill-promo-2a-640x430.jpg
321 ms
Niklas-Walentin_Strings-253-Wordpress-640x360.jpg
142 ms
GITCSweet16_PC_Vaccese_DSC_2843-2-640x430.jpg
181 ms
ag_sl.jpg
104 ms
st_sl.jpg
109 ms
uk_sl.jpg
142 ms
Stage_Studio.jpg
142 ms
E-v1.js
106 ms
9k-RPmcnxYEPm8CNFsH2gg.woff
61 ms
wkfQbvfT_02e2IWO3yYueQ.woff
62 ms
collect
45 ms
loadingAnimation.gif
36 ms
menu_down.gif
48 ms
overlay.png
36 ms
g.gif
7 ms
stringletter.com accessibility score
stringletter.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
stringletter.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Stringletter.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Stringletter.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
stringletter.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Stringletter. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: