3.5 sec in total
812 ms
2.3 sec
450 ms
Click here to check amazing Stromanbieter Preisvergleich content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about stromanbieterpreisvergleich.org
Visit stromanbieterpreisvergleich.orgWe analyzed Stromanbieterpreisvergleich.org page load time and found that the first response time was 812 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
stromanbieterpreisvergleich.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.5 s
66/100
10%
Value4.0 s
50/100
25%
Value7.6 s
25/100
10%
Value370 ms
71/100
30%
Value0.189
65/100
15%
Value7.6 s
46/100
10%
812 ms
124 ms
219 ms
222 ms
298 ms
Our browser made a total of 27 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 30% of them (8 requests) were addressed to the original Stromanbieterpreisvergleich.org, 56% (15 requests) were made to Aserv.toptarif.de and 7% (2 requests) were made to Partner.toptarif.de. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (812 ms) belongs to the original domain Stromanbieterpreisvergleich.org.
Page size can be reduced by 135.3 kB (63%)
214.8 kB
79.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Stromanbieterpreisvergleich.org main page is 214.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 78.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 22.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 22.2 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 448 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Stromanbieter Preisvergleich images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 46.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 46.9 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 65.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Stromanbieterpreisvergleich.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 65.7 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (69%)
26
8
The browser has sent 26 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Stromanbieter Preisvergleich. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.stromanbieterpreisvergleich.org
812 ms
style.css
124 ms
layout.css
219 ms
custom.css
222 ms
index_wls0.html
298 ms
go.cgi
721 ms
banner250x200.html
300 ms
stromanbieter-preisvergleich.jpg
371 ms
Stromanbieter-Preisvergleich-300x200.jpg
260 ms
go.cgi
787 ms
82206891647d139e03df8903.js
357 ms
comment-reply.min.js
260 ms
dot-ddd.gif
148 ms
base.css
196 ms
flow.css
297 ms
wl.0.css
199 ms
jquery-1.3.2.min.js
408 ms
jquery.tooltip.js
204 ms
hiddenInputs2.js
201 ms
strom.js
391 ms
getGETParameter.js
397 ms
widgetdata.php
214 ms
toptarif_250x200_strom.gif
203 ms
trans.gif
101 ms
tooltip_frage.gif
194 ms
dropdown_icon.gif
198 ms
button_red.gif
198 ms
stromanbieterpreisvergleich.org accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
stromanbieterpreisvergleich.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
stromanbieterpreisvergleich.org SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
DE
DE
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Stromanbieterpreisvergleich.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Stromanbieterpreisvergleich.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
stromanbieterpreisvergleich.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Stromanbieter Preisvergleich. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: