3.4 sec in total
240 ms
1.7 sec
1.5 sec
Welcome to stuartduff.com homepage info - get ready to check Stuart Duff best content right away, or after learning these important things about stuartduff.com
Web Developer, Tea Drinker, Over Thinker
Visit stuartduff.comWe analyzed Stuartduff.com page load time and found that the first response time was 240 ms and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
stuartduff.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.3 s
39/100
10%
Value3.4 s
68/100
25%
Value4.0 s
81/100
10%
Value230 ms
86/100
30%
Value0.105
88/100
15%
Value4.4 s
83/100
10%
240 ms
48 ms
15 ms
22 ms
20 ms
Our browser made a total of 51 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 39% of them (20 requests) were addressed to the original Stuartduff.com, 24% (12 requests) were made to Scontent.cdninstagram.com and 12% (6 requests) were made to Appicons.about.me. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) relates to the external source Scontent.cdninstagram.com.
Page size can be reduced by 73.1 kB (6%)
1.2 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Stuartduff.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 63.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 63.7 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 9.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Stuart Duff images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 65 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (55%)
42
19
The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Stuart Duff. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
stuartduff.com
240 ms
css
48 ms
a2b955aec87af70b896107f1805c44b6.css
15 ms
0b42c8bf9c046bf928209bb73f1a803b.css
22 ms
57d546dd7990c015ffe50945975d365e.css
20 ms
1e842bcda2085b3f16538d4d3c98b79c.css
26 ms
jquery.js
189 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
33 ms
jquery.mmenu.min.js
33 ms
jquery.framework.min.js
33 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
34 ms
general.min.js
40 ms
functions.js
34 ms
stuartduff
33 ms
photon.js
59 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
34 ms
thickbox.js
32 ms
wp-embed.min.js
31 ms
e-201611.js
33 ms
stuartduff
126 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
18 ms
32x32.png
252 ms
stuartduff_1416777737_16.jpg
452 ms
12568100_1552598218390828_1269158386_n.jpg
548 ms
logo.jpg
141 ms
12256654_510159392494760_394462130_n.jpg
724 ms
12237525_534087206756306_1784473966_n.jpg
879 ms
11934682_1517023441942861_14636556_n.jpg
890 ms
12144192_486407654870856_209567706_n.jpg
927 ms
12132907_1012970098723397_1718482929_n.jpg
972 ms
12063022_1169292796421365_1857310488_n.jpg
1041 ms
11348234_1663547067223348_823843333_n.jpg
900 ms
12063214_180886358913130_39002987_n.jpg
1053 ms
11909134_1642072812727353_1817326670_n.jpg
1113 ms
11925584_422134341310676_1540168487_n.jpg
1074 ms
10725168_1603969589872705_1138809508_n.jpg
1198 ms
32x32.png
223 ms
32x32.png
220 ms
32x32.png
246 ms
32x32.png
252 ms
32x32.png
249 ms
9k-RPmcnxYEPm8CNFsH2gg.woff
136 ms
wkfQbvfT_02e2IWO3yYueQ.woff
137 ms
BVtM30trf7q_jfqYeHfjtA.woff
138 ms
HkF_qI1x_noxlxhrhMQYED8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
136 ms
VNUH7ZAcagYBWsAiBBCEYz8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
137 ms
oUan5VrEkpzIazlUe5ieaA.woff
137 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
401 ms
loadingAnimation.gif
53 ms
g.gif
43 ms
lazyload.1.0.2.min.js
7 ms
stuartduff.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
stuartduff.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
stuartduff.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Stuartduff.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Stuartduff.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
stuartduff.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Stuart Duff. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: