3.2 sec in total
226 ms
2 sec
966 ms
Visit style.com now to see the best up-to-date Style content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about style.com
From the world’s best designer fashion to emerging brands, open doors to 100.000+ styles on FARFETCH. ✈ Get express delivery & free returns.
Visit style.comWe analyzed Style.com page load time and found that the first response time was 226 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
style.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.6 s
6/100
10%
Value10.9 s
0/100
25%
Value8.1 s
21/100
10%
Value5,220 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.438
21/100
15%
Value24.6 s
0/100
10%
226 ms
894 ms
148 ms
132 ms
144 ms
Our browser made a total of 45 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Style.com, 82% (37 requests) were made to Cdn-static.farfetch-contents.com and 9% (4 requests) were made to Farfetch.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (894 ms) relates to the external source Farfetch.com.
Page size can be reduced by 611.7 kB (46%)
1.3 MB
716.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Style.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 709.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 253.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 253.6 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 184.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Style needs image optimization as it can save up to 184.7 kB or 26% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 148.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 148.6 kB or 62% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 24.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Style.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 24.9 kB or 68% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 38 (88%)
43
5
The browser has sent 43 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Style. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 34 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
style.com
226 ms
www.farfetch.com
894 ms
react-box-43.039f971e.client.42e28fb954c17dd4a0f4.css
148 ms
react-box-42.2125db3d.client.c298d58ac40688fab007.css
132 ms
react-box-37.da6e46da.client.be369b4a5cc39587e825.css
144 ms
7345.client.3879b248ac6649e63881.css
144 ms
default.client.bdf3a797d71569af38d6.css
136 ms
69071.client.c5c58f2104a4665ef6cf.css
145 ms
cpuMonitor.v1.js
167 ms
setNewRelicUserCustomAttributes.js
139 ms
eventManager.min.js
144 ms
runtime.client.97781c5e0c8d48ad302f.esnext.js
157 ms
7345.client.e84f5a1b8abbb7c17606.esnext.js
362 ms
64372.client.678b45239333b1f98d56.esnext.js
155 ms
95868.client.5e0382099fd7afe98fa1.esnext.js
143 ms
52143.client.e633410956a50139b731.esnext.js
320 ms
45768.client.daa685bc4ac1cab546ba.esnext.js
321 ms
10598.client.9d5d97ce43964e66ce59.esnext.js
361 ms
25485.client.5edb29115e0367cc5b35.esnext.js
360 ms
99917.client.15f812e708e51f5a4ead.esnext.js
370 ms
43712.client.941e8450951ea91f80ef.esnext.js
371 ms
11814.client.6108ee96a3331607fad2.esnext.js
369 ms
21835.client.077a71234222d2099ddf.esnext.js
372 ms
7610.client.ff26446ed206b04bdf19.esnext.js
372 ms
5945.client.cf28f66aee551126a8ac.esnext.js
385 ms
1437.client.7389726cdd005cd8b64b.esnext.js
384 ms
43038.client.53b57b273472373a33a9.esnext.js
372 ms
64346.client.fb5883f9c71409b60812.esnext.js
389 ms
48804.client.59611e48595149904d29.esnext.js
382 ms
25179.client.81586d30a3452378dd52.esnext.js
383 ms
87357.client.adee9e97924ba3a24298.esnext.js
382 ms
54022.client.26aeccc3982311a03243.esnext.js
388 ms
1803.client.fbbf43e2f132c54a9043.esnext.js
398 ms
13762.client.ffd0c8d54954dccd810d.esnext.js
397 ms
default.client.956563a395def7d5c450.esnext.js
389 ms
GetUniversalVariableUserScript
396 ms
tracking-library-stable.min.js
395 ms
786c13b3
99 ms
gtm.js
311 ms
V8BTZ-CS5UD-BDWCH-VUP73-K8QTK
732 ms
welcome-page-image-ww.png
114 ms
welcome-page-image-mw.png
109 ms
welcome-page-image-kw.png
111 ms
AwB3U0c
196 ms
gtm.js
94 ms
style.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
style.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
style.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Style.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Style.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
style.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Style. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: