4.8 sec in total
1.2 sec
2.8 sec
726 ms
Welcome to stylediggin.com homepage info - get ready to check Stylediggin best content right away, or after learning these important things about stylediggin.com
Visit stylediggin.comWe analyzed Stylediggin.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.2 sec and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
stylediggin.com performance score
1244 ms
85 ms
36 ms
140 ms
171 ms
Our browser made a total of 61 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 64% of them (39 requests) were addressed to the original Stylediggin.com, 13% (8 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 5% (3 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Stylediggin.com.
Page size can be reduced by 147.7 kB (10%)
1.4 MB
1.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Stylediggin.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 31.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 31.9 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 11.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Stylediggin images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 59.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 59.3 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 45.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Stylediggin.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 45.0 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (37%)
59
37
The browser has sent 59 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Stylediggin. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
stylediggin.com
1244 ms
jquery.min.js
85 ms
js
36 ms
dpagination.js
140 ms
index.css
171 ms
style.css
135 ms
shortcode.css
181 ms
superfish.js
149 ms
smthemes.js
172 ms
jquery.cycle.all.js
259 ms
wide.css
100 ms
font.css
86 ms
052214-cannes-chanel-594.jpg
441 ms
2014-mtv-vmas-taylor-swift-billboard-650.jpg
164 ms
arrow-up.png
139 ms
search.png
138 ms
1.jpg
282 ms
2.jpg
277 ms
3.jpg
373 ms
4.jpg
340 ms
5.jpg
551 ms
Fake-Fashion.jpg
479 ms
Anoraks.jpg
553 ms
Autumn-Fashion-300x225.jpg
578 ms
Fashion-for-Small-Ladies-277x300.jpg
653 ms
Celeb-Designers.jpg
631 ms
Latest-Fashion.jpg
684 ms
Jeans-269x300.jpg
710 ms
Fall-Fashion-300x150.jpg
766 ms
slide-right.png
741 ms
slide-left.png
811 ms
list.png
809 ms
post.png
813 ms
readmore.png
882 ms
OpenSans-Regular-webfont.woff
912 ms
Oswald-Regular-webfont.woff
923 ms
widgets.js
115 ms
cuprum-regular-webfont.woff
932 ms
OpenSans-ExtraBold-webfont.woff
940 ms
plusone.js
68 ms
footer.png
871 ms
slider-page-active.png
914 ms
slider-page.png
1070 ms
like.php
212 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
13 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
36 ms
fastbutton
96 ms
button.0308b81ff1714e446f674b5b9793f2cd.js
121 ms
postmessageRelay
54 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
28 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
25 ms
W5F8_SL0XFawnjxHGsZjJA.ttf
42 ms
3193398744-postmessagerelay.js
33 ms
rpc:shindig_random.js
48 ms
qeKvIRsJabD.js
51 ms
LVx-xkvaJ0b.png
40 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
21 ms
tweet_button.b9740740e0bcf9b0657c5b11bd4388da.en.html
52 ms
jot
96 ms
mobile.css
81 ms
tablet.css
58 ms
stylediggin.com SEO score
ZH
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Stylediggin.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Chinese is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Stylediggin.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
stylediggin.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Stylediggin. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: