Tools & Wizards About Us
sugam.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 28

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    48% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

sugam.in

SUGAM - Water Treatment Company in India | Industrial Wastewater Treatment, STP ETP ZLD Plants

Page Load Speed

1 sec in total

First Response

102 ms

Resources Loaded

654 ms

Page Rendered

270 ms

sugam.in screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing SUGAM content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about sugam.in

Engaged in Manufacturing wastewater treatment plants, sewage treatment plant (STP), Effluenet treatment plant(ETP), Zero liquid discharge (ZLD), Desalination, Lake rejuvenation, River cleaning and wat...

Visit sugam.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Sugam.in page load time and found that the first response time was 102 ms and then it took 924 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

sugam.in performance score

28

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.0 s

85/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.3 s

5/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.4 s

19/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,430 ms

5/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.067

96/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.1 s

7/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

sugam.in

102 ms

styles.css

7 ms

css

22 ms

bootstrap.min.css

14 ms

jquery.smartmenus.bootstrap.css

8 ms

Our browser made a total of 107 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 74% of them (79 requests) were addressed to the original Sugam.in, 18% (19 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (213 ms) relates to the external source Facebook.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 731.3 kB (35%)

Content Size

2.1 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Sugam.in main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 38.2 kB

  • Original 45.3 kB
  • After minification 33.2 kB
  • After compression 7.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 12.1 kB, which is 27% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 38.2 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-20%

Potential reduce by 286.3 kB

  • Original 1.4 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, SUGAM needs image optimization as it can save up to 286.3 kB or 20% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 399.2 kB

  • Original 559.0 kB
  • After minification 452.1 kB
  • After compression 159.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 399.2 kB or 71% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-18%

Potential reduce by 7.6 kB

  • Original 42.1 kB
  • After minification 42.1 kB
  • After compression 34.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sugam.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 7.6 kB or 18% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 40 (41%)

Requests Now

97

After Optimization

57

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 97 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of SUGAM. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

sugam.in

sugam.in

102 ms

styles.css

styles.css

7 ms

css

css

22 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

14 ms

jquery.smartmenus.bootstrap.css

jquery.smartmenus.bootstrap.css

8 ms

css

css

36 ms

ico-moon.css

ico-moon.css

12 ms

default.css

default.css

10 ms

light.css

light.css

11 ms

dark.css

dark.css

11 ms

bar.css

bar.css

19 ms

nivo-slider.css

nivo-slider.css

19 ms

animate.css

animate.css

20 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

22 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

23 ms

jquery-1.11.0.min.js

jquery-1.11.0.min.js

25 ms

jquery.smartmenus.js

jquery.smartmenus.js

23 ms

jquery.smartmenus.bootstrap.js

jquery.smartmenus.bootstrap.js

22 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

26 ms

bootstrap-transition.html

bootstrap-transition.html

25 ms

bootstrap-carousel.html

bootstrap-carousel.html

26 ms

jquery-1.9.0.min.html

jquery-1.9.0.min.html

25 ms

jquery.nivo.slider.js

jquery.nivo.slider.js

23 ms

jquery.flexisel.js

jquery.flexisel.js

25 ms

app.js

app.js

27 ms

jquery.nicescroll.min.js

jquery.nicescroll.min.js

28 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

116 ms

header-bg.jpg

header-bg.jpg

114 ms

logo.png

logo.png

11 ms

icon3.png

icon3.png

11 ms

nav-divider.png

nav-divider.png

27 ms

stp.jpg

stp.jpg

29 ms

zld.jpg

zld.jpg

33 ms

multitowerdesign.jpg

multitowerdesign.jpg

29 ms

heading-divider.jpg

heading-divider.jpg

27 ms

waste-water-recycling.png

waste-water-recycling.png

27 ms

heading.gif

heading.gif

35 ms

case_bathinda.jpg

case_bathinda.jpg

34 ms

stp-shuklatirth.jpg

stp-shuklatirth.jpg

35 ms

4.jpeg

4.jpeg

36 ms

5.jpeg

5.jpeg

35 ms

1.jpg

1.jpg

40 ms

2.jpg

2.jpg

43 ms

3.jpg

3.jpg

42 ms

1.png

1.png

42 ms

2.png

2.png

40 ms

3.png

3.png

41 ms

4.png

4.png

43 ms

5.png

5.png

43 ms

6.png

6.png

46 ms

7.png

7.png

46 ms

8.png

8.png

45 ms

9.png

9.png

45 ms

10.png

10.png

45 ms

11.png

11.png

46 ms

12.png

12.png

49 ms

13.png

13.png

52 ms

14.png

14.png

50 ms

15.png

15.png

50 ms

16.png

16.png

72 ms

17.png

17.png

50 ms

18.png

18.png

54 ms

19.png

19.png

55 ms

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf

28 ms

page.php

page.php

213 ms

icomoon.woff

icomoon.woff

51 ms

glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff

glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff

65 ms

collect

collect

35 ms

raleway-extrabold-webfont.woff

raleway-extrabold-webfont.woff

51 ms

20.png

20.png

52 ms

21.png

21.png

50 ms

22.png

22.png

52 ms

23.png

23.png

52 ms

24.png

24.png

49 ms

25.png

25.png

50 ms

26.png

26.png

48 ms

27.png

27.png

47 ms

28.png

28.png

58 ms

29.png

29.png

58 ms

sabic.jpg

sabic.jpg

55 ms

ebullient.jpg

ebullient.jpg

54 ms

bullet.png

bullet.png

52 ms

car1.gif

car1.gif

52 ms

js

js

91 ms

eOzOzediAge.css

eOzOzediAge.css

19 ms

cuPjK18RJ2t.css

cuPjK18RJ2t.css

22 ms

CAfgKYFpIyM.css

CAfgKYFpIyM.css

23 ms

VWDhCULazb5.js

VWDhCULazb5.js

29 ms

5xOV5e9oy4e.js

5xOV5e9oy4e.js

26 ms

mP12tTiNgO_.js

mP12tTiNgO_.js

27 ms

owo2sPJxB2z.js

owo2sPJxB2z.js

26 ms

p55HfXW__mM.js

p55HfXW__mM.js

24 ms

k_PjgALRjoR.js

k_PjgALRjoR.js

27 ms

YEtUGb-ToKw.js

YEtUGb-ToKw.js

64 ms

XKFYjgE7mEh.js

XKFYjgE7mEh.js

68 ms

g2XPN2wRGmV.js

g2XPN2wRGmV.js

28 ms

E6qR0C8WEpl.js

E6qR0C8WEpl.js

81 ms

kgAz0TBWoYE.js

kgAz0TBWoYE.js

81 ms

DPxpTcknHiI.js

DPxpTcknHiI.js

91 ms

HzxD9aAXSyD.js

HzxD9aAXSyD.js

93 ms

o1ndYS2og_B.js

o1ndYS2og_B.js

90 ms

283110679_108270838558924_494211031514815113_n.jpg

283110679_108270838558924_494211031514815113_n.jpg

46 ms

u2HYktv2mdq.js

u2HYktv2mdq.js

5 ms

281962254_108267345225940_654691014670478918_n.jpg

281962254_108267345225940_654691014670478918_n.jpg

20 ms

UXtr_j2Fwe-.png

UXtr_j2Fwe-.png

3 ms

button-previous.png

button-previous.png

11 ms

button-next.png

button-next.png

7 ms

Accessibility Review

sugam.in accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

sugam.in best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

sugam.in SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sugam.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sugam.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

sugam.in

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of SUGAM. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: