3.6 sec in total
169 ms
2.8 sec
595 ms
Visit sugaring.london now to see the best up-to-date Sugaring content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about sugaring.london
Sugaring Hair Removal is the next hair removal trend in London you are going to be obsessed with.Our best therapists are highly trained in the art of sugaring!
Visit sugaring.londonWe analyzed Sugaring.london page load time and found that the first response time was 169 ms and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
sugaring.london performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.4 s
36/100
10%
Value10.9 s
0/100
25%
Value5.6 s
53/100
10%
Value670 ms
44/100
30%
Value1.01
2/100
15%
Value8.8 s
35/100
10%
169 ms
879 ms
132 ms
210 ms
302 ms
Our browser made a total of 84 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 87% of them (73 requests) were addressed to the original Sugaring.london, 5% (4 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) belongs to the original domain Sugaring.london.
Page size can be reduced by 115.6 kB (4%)
2.9 MB
2.8 MB
In fact, the total size of Sugaring.london main page is 2.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 45.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 10.7 kB, which is 19% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 45.7 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 60 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Sugaring images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 36.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 36.2 kB or 20% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 33.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sugaring.london needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 33.7 kB or 23% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 46 (60%)
77
31
The browser has sent 77 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sugaring. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
sugaring.london
169 ms
sugaring.london
879 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
132 ms
style.min.css
210 ms
style.min.css
302 ms
style.min.css
307 ms
style.min.css
228 ms
style.min.css
229 ms
vendors-style.css
287 ms
style.css
392 ms
woocommerce-layout.css
311 ms
woocommerce.css
313 ms
style.css
364 ms
bootstrap.min.css
381 ms
theme.css
378 ms
styles.css
458 ms
style.css
399 ms
jquery.min.js
515 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
456 ms
jquery-3.3.1.min.js
457 ms
scripts.js
473 ms
jquery.cookie.min.js
473 ms
wooptpm.js
542 ms
js
59 ms
player_api
45 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
490 ms
js.cookie.min.js
491 ms
woocommerce.min.js
509 ms
cart-fragments.min.js
557 ms
popper.min.js
564 ms
bootstrap.min.js
612 ms
retina.min.js
611 ms
jquery.sticky.js
612 ms
google-ads.js
619 ms
wp-embed.min.js
634 ms
widget-book-now-2dc89e.js
4 ms
fbevents.js
76 ms
analytics.js
125 ms
gtm.js
72 ms
logo.svg
187 ms
instagram-icon.svg
191 ms
facebook-icon.svg
188 ms
pinterest_logo.svg
191 ms
Tiktok_logo.svg
204 ms
logo_small.svg
205 ms
phone_icon.svg
226 ms
bg.jpg
437 ms
top_bg.png
291 ms
carousel_shape_top.png
292 ms
carousel_shape_bottom.png
292 ms
slide1.jpg
601 ms
slide2.jpg
458 ms
slides_5.jpg
589 ms
slide3.jpg
518 ms
slide4.jpg
593 ms
hero_video_thumbnail.webp
513 ms
play.png
549 ms
homepage_packages.webp
599 ms
ingredients.png
598 ms
about-us.png
701 ms
reviews_bottom_bg.jpg
666 ms
testimonials_shape_top.png
672 ms
review2.png
674 ms
review.png
676 ms
review3.png
903 ms
arrow-left.png
744 ms
arrow-right.png
752 ms
www-widgetapi.js
59 ms
testimonials_shape_bottom.png
706 ms
contacts_bg.jpg
698 ms
phone-icon.png
721 ms
FuturaPTCond-Bold.woff
719 ms
FuturaPTCond-ExtraBold.woff
726 ms
FuturaPT-Book.woff
725 ms
linkid.js
17 ms
ec.js
60 ms
FuturaPTCond-Book.woff
710 ms
email-icon.png
727 ms
sugaring.london
1018 ms
cactus.png
791 ms
christiana.jpg
797 ms
collect
15 ms
js
55 ms
woocommerce-smallscreen.css
80 ms
sugaring.london accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
sugaring.london best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
sugaring.london SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sugaring.london can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sugaring.london main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
sugaring.london
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Sugaring. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: