Tools & Wizards About Us
sulcare.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 72

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    82% of other websites

  • 90

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 75% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 75

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    32% of websites

sulcare.com

Log into Facebook

Page Load Speed

2.9 sec in total

First Response

367 ms

Resources Loaded

2.3 sec

Page Rendered

175 ms

sulcare.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Sulcare content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about sulcare.com

Log into Facebook to start sharing and connecting with your friends, family, and people you know.

Visit sulcare.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Sulcare.com page load time and found that the first response time was 367 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

sulcare.com performance score

72

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

18/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.4 s

38/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.3 s

76/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.3 s

85/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

sulcare.com

367 ms

303 ms

k2.css

305 ms

template.css

587 ms

mootools-core.js

502 ms

Our browser made a total of 25 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (21 requests) were addressed to the original Sulcare.com, 12% (3 requests) were made to Stetic.com and 4% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (587 ms) belongs to the original domain Sulcare.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 359.2 kB (56%)

Content Size

641.6 kB

After Optimization

282.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Sulcare.com main page is 641.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 238.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 8.8 kB

  • Original 13.1 kB
  • After minification 12.3 kB
  • After compression 4.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 8.8 kB or 67% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 14.5 kB

  • Original 180.6 kB
  • After minification 166.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Sulcare images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 155.0 kB

  • Original 238.9 kB
  • After minification 236.6 kB
  • After compression 83.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 155.0 kB or 65% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 180.9 kB

  • Original 209.0 kB
  • After minification 169.2 kB
  • After compression 28.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sulcare.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 180.9 kB or 87% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (43%)

Requests Now

23

After Optimization

13

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 23 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sulcare. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

sulcare.com

sulcare.com

367 ms

303 ms

k2.css

k2.css

305 ms

template.css

template.css

587 ms

mootools-core.js

mootools-core.js

502 ms

core.js

core.js

209 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

501 ms

jquery-noconflict.js

jquery-noconflict.js

210 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

316 ms

k2.js

k2.js

317 ms

caption.js

caption.js

411 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

522 ms

template.js

template.js

425 ms

css

css

24 ms

t.js

t.js

197 ms

logo_lang.jpg

logo_lang.jpg

213 ms

pt.jpg

pt.jpg

125 ms

en.gif

en.gif

115 ms

de.gif

de.gif

112 ms

sale.jpg

sale.jpg

122 ms

Rental.jpg

Rental.jpg

406 ms

service.jpg

service.jpg

222 ms

IcoMoon.woff

IcoMoon.woff

319 ms

FNUM-115708439069-7MpQxB8c.js

FNUM-115708439069-7MpQxB8c.js

407 ms

stats

stats

229 ms

Accessibility Review

sulcare.com accessibility score

90

Accessibility Issues

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

sulcare.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

sulcare.com SEO score

75

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    DE

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sulcare.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed German language. Our system also found out that Sulcare.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

sulcare.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Sulcare. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: