Report Summary

  • 75

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    84% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 62% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 75

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    32% of websites

surfstow.com

Waterbrands

Page Load Speed

2.4 sec in total

First Response

71 ms

Resources Loaded

1.6 sec

Page Rendered

772 ms

surfstow.com screenshot

About Website

Visit surfstow.com now to see the best up-to-date Surfstow content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about surfstow.com

Visit surfstow.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Surfstow.com page load time and found that the first response time was 71 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

surfstow.com performance score

75

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

46/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

58/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.1 s

93/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value310 ms

77/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.007

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.9 s

88/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.surfstow.com

71 ms

ModuleStyleSheets.css

7 ms

site_global.css

26 ms

master_master-a.css

34 ms

index.css

21 ms

Our browser made a total of 74 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 66% of them (49 requests) were addressed to the original Surfstow.com, 11% (8 requests) were made to Webfonts.creativecloud.com and 8% (6 requests) were made to S.swiftypecdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (618 ms) relates to the external source Webfonts.creativecloud.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 762.9 kB (36%)

Content Size

2.1 MB

After Optimization

1.4 MB

In fact, the total size of Surfstow.com main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 70.4 kB

  • Original 81.0 kB
  • After minification 53.0 kB
  • After compression 10.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 27.9 kB, which is 35% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 70.4 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 35.5 kB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Surfstow images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 436.9 kB

  • Original 636.6 kB
  • After minification 632.5 kB
  • After compression 199.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 436.9 kB or 69% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 220.2 kB

  • Original 264.1 kB
  • After minification 241.6 kB
  • After compression 43.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Surfstow.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 220.2 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 31 (46%)

Requests Now

67

After Optimization

36

The browser has sent 67 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Surfstow. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

surfstow.com accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best Practices

surfstow.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

surfstow.com SEO score

75

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Surfstow.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Surfstow.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Surfstow. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: