11.4 sec in total
3.2 sec
7.9 sec
355 ms
Welcome to swfgeek.net homepage info - get ready to check Swfgeek best content right away, or after learning these important things about swfgeek.net
Visit swfgeek.netWe analyzed Swfgeek.net page load time and found that the first response time was 3.2 sec and then it took 8.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster. This domain responded with an error, which can significantly jeopardize Swfgeek.net rating and web reputation
swfgeek.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.4 s
70/100
10%
Value14.0 s
0/100
25%
Value4.7 s
69/100
10%
Value500 ms
58/100
30%
Value0.713
7/100
15%
Value5.3 s
73/100
10%
3150 ms
133 ms
36 ms
205 ms
141 ms
Our browser made a total of 55 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 49% of them (27 requests) were addressed to the original Swfgeek.net, 13% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 7% (4 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Swfgeek.net.
Page size can be reduced by 422.9 kB (15%)
2.8 MB
2.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Swfgeek.net main page is 2.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 39.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 39.4 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 13.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Swfgeek images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 144.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 144.2 kB or 55% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 226.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Swfgeek.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 226.1 kB or 80% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (82%)
45
8
The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Swfgeek. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.swfgeek.net
3150 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
133 ms
css
36 ms
twentysixteen.css
205 ms
fancybox.css
141 ms
style.css
270 ms
style.css
137 ms
css
63 ms
genericons.css
208 ms
jetpack.css
273 ms
codebox.css
209 ms
plusone.js
62 ms
jquery.js
359 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
276 ms
jquery.fancybox.js
276 ms
codebox.js
278 ms
wide_form.css
341 ms
cforms.js
345 ms
shCore.js
346 ms
shAutoloader.js
347 ms
shCoreDefault.css
349 ms
swfobject.js
682 ms
q
26 ms
show_ads.js
26 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
21 ms
gprofiles.js
73 ms
wpgroho.js
694 ms
skip-link-focus-fix.js
417 ms
functions.js
417 ms
wp-embed.min.js
424 ms
e-201611.js
22 ms
style.css
467 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
14 ms
calendar.css
73 ms
ga.js
8 ms
__utm.gif
12 ms
swfgeek_net.png
723 ms
ca-pub-9092206590322028.js
225 ms
zrt_lookup.html
246 ms
show_ads_impl.js
165 ms
IQHow_FEYlDC4Gzy_m8fcgFhaRv2pGgT5Kf0An0s4MM.woff
208 ms
IQHow_FEYlDC4Gzy_m8fcgFhaRv2pGgT5Kf0An0s4MM.woff
128 ms
zhcz-_WihjSQC0oHJ9TCYBsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
215 ms
zhcz-_WihjSQC0oHJ9TCYBsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
142 ms
RFda8w1V0eDZheqfcyQ4EBa1RVmPjeKy21_GQJaLlJI.woff
240 ms
ZvcMqxEwPfh2qDWBPxn6nhGYIVA-f1n-gQW6IKoy_-M.woff
241 ms
ZvcMqxEwPfh2qDWBPxn6njPY4jw7fdqC-GX3uhj9onc.woff
241 ms
widgets.js
124 ms
Genericons.svg
256 ms
8AAnjaY2BgYGQAgosrjpwF0ZcUq9bCaABTzgdAAAA=
104 ms
hovercard.css
92 ms
services.css
119 ms
g.gif
87 ms
ads
233 ms
osd.js
17 ms
swfgeek.net accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
[lang] attributes do not have a valid value
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
swfgeek.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
swfgeek.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
ZH
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Swfgeek.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Chinese is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Swfgeek.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
swfgeek.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Swfgeek. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: