5.7 sec in total
991 ms
4.3 sec
407 ms
Click here to check amazing Swift content for United Kingdom. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about swift.trade
Visit swift.tradeWe analyzed Swift.trade page load time and found that the first response time was 991 ms and then it took 4.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
swift.trade performance score
991 ms
174 ms
519 ms
175 ms
176 ms
Our browser made a total of 78 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 97% of them (76 requests) were addressed to the original Swift.trade, 1% (1 request) were made to Maps.googleapis.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Swift.trade.
Page size can be reduced by 529.5 kB (57%)
924.3 kB
394.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Swift.trade main page is 924.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 296.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 73.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 23.4 kB, which is 28% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 73.7 kB or 87% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 36.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Swift needs image optimization as it can save up to 36.6 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 210.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 210.4 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 208.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Swift.trade needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 208.9 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (37%)
68
43
The browser has sent 68 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Swift. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
swift.trade
991 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
174 ms
bootstrap.min.css
519 ms
owl.carousel-2.css
175 ms
owl.theme.css
176 ms
owl.transitions.css
176 ms
font-awesome.min.css
345 ms
animate.css
346 ms
main.css
528 ms
top-trade-logo-min.png
261 ms
logo-white.png
297 ms
ic-close-white.png
436 ms
long-arrow-blue.png
384 ms
ic-menu.png
428 ms
long-arrow-white.png
310 ms
1.png
348 ms
register.png
402 ms
right-arrow.png
402 ms
2.png
437 ms
consultations.png
474 ms
3.png
478 ms
deposit.png
478 ms
4.png
479 ms
trade.png
485 ms
screen1-min.jpg
572 ms
screen2-min.jpg
524 ms
screen3-min.jpg
563 ms
group-19.png
565 ms
group-34.png
564 ms
group-36.png
571 ms
group-17.png
613 ms
group-40.png
647 ms
group-50.png
648 ms
group-52.png
649 ms
group-46.png
658 ms
group-45.png
657 ms
bitmap.png
658 ms
nomura.png
690 ms
america.png
691 ms
morgan.png
679 ms
js
60 ms
jquery.mask.js
54 ms
jquery.js
839 ms
bootstrap.min.js
700 ms
owl.carousel-2.min.js
707 ms
jquery.googlemap.js
605 ms
jquery.cookie.js
604 ms
common.js
654 ms
form-ajax.js
607 ms
wp-embed.min.js
606 ms
credit.png
651 ms
barclays.png
656 ms
generale.png
603 ms
bnp.png
603 ms
ubs.png
569 ms
citibank.png
576 ms
bancorp.png
541 ms
SFUIDisplay-Regular.woff
1058 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
871 ms
SFUIDisplay-Bold.woff
1241 ms
SFUIDisplay-Light.woff
1292 ms
effex.png
613 ms
fill-13.png
574 ms
mastercard.png
622 ms
maestro.png
623 ms
skrill.png
708 ms
neteller.png
703 ms
unionpay.png
790 ms
j-c-b.png
748 ms
ic-close.png
784 ms
gb.png
799 ms
bg.png
798 ms
SFUIDisplay-Regular.ttf
810 ms
SFUIDisplay-Bold.ttf
764 ms
SFUIDisplay-Light.ttf
454 ms
SFUIDisplay-Light.svg
706 ms
SFUIDisplay-Regular.svg
866 ms
SFUIDisplay-Bold.svg
782 ms
swift.trade SEO score
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Swift.trade can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Swift.trade main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
swift.trade
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Swift. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: