Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

Page Load Speed

7.4 sec in total

First Response

460 ms

Resources Loaded

4.8 sec

Page Rendered

2.1 sec

swproposal.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Swproposal content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about swproposal.com

SWPP Software Proposal Creator helps you create great software proposal online with client relationship management functionality and professional proposal template sample. Win your sales bid today!!

Visit swproposal.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Swproposal.com page load time and found that the first response time was 460 ms and then it took 6.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

swproposal.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

swproposal.com

460 ms

swproposal.com

627 ms

font-awesome.css

63 ms

whhg.css

132 ms

swppiconstyle.css

252 ms

Our browser made a total of 68 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 93% of them (63 requests) were addressed to the original Swproposal.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Netdna.bootstrapcdn.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Swproposal.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 822.4 kB (41%)

Content Size

2.0 MB

After Optimization

1.2 MB

In fact, the total size of Swproposal.com main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 53.1 kB

  • Original 64.0 kB
  • After minification 43.6 kB
  • After compression 10.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 20.4 kB, which is 32% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 53.1 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 143.3 kB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 1.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Swproposal needs image optimization as it can save up to 143.3 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 356.6 kB

  • Original 441.3 kB
  • After minification 250.5 kB
  • After compression 84.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 356.6 kB or 81% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 269.4 kB

  • Original 314.7 kB
  • After minification 264.6 kB
  • After compression 45.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Swproposal.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 269.4 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (29%)

Requests Now

63

After Optimization

45

The browser has sent 63 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Swproposal. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

SEO Factors

swproposal.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Swproposal.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Swproposal.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Swproposal. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: