Tools & Wizards About Us
syscall.ws screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

syscall.ws

Amazon Simple Storage Service (S3) - Cloud Storage

Page Load Speed

1.6 sec in total

First Response

40 ms

Resources Loaded

1.1 sec

Page Rendered

492 ms

syscall.ws screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Syscall content for Brazil. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about syscall.ws

Looking for highly-scalable object storage? Amazon S3 can help you with Backup and Archive, Big Data and much more. Get started with cloud storage here.

Visit syscall.ws

Key Findings

We analyzed Syscall.ws page load time and found that the first response time was 40 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

syscall.ws performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

40 ms

style.css

121 ms

head.2.0.js

160 ms

awshome_s_code.js

159 ms

aws-target-mediator.js

116 ms

Our browser made a total of 44 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Syscall.ws, 36% (16 requests) were made to D0.awsstatic.com and 16% (7 requests) were made to Amazonwebservicesinc.tt.omtrdc.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (319 ms) relates to the external source Amazonwebservicesinc.tt.omtrdc.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.6 MB (54%)

Content Size

3.1 MB

After Optimization

1.4 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Syscall.ws main page is 3.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 175.4 kB

  • Original 200.3 kB
  • After minification 161.9 kB
  • After compression 24.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 38.3 kB, which is 19% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 175.4 kB or 88% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-40%

Potential reduce by 794.1 kB

  • Original 2.0 MB
  • After minification 1.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Syscall needs image optimization as it can save up to 794.1 kB or 40% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 342.7 kB

  • Original 491.3 kB
  • After minification 478.9 kB
  • After compression 148.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 342.7 kB or 70% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 329.5 kB

  • Original 382.1 kB
  • After minification 377.9 kB
  • After compression 52.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Syscall.ws needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 329.5 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (26%)

Requests Now

34

After Optimization

25

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 34 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Syscall. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

40 ms

style.css

style.css

121 ms

head.2.0.js

head.2.0.js

160 ms

awshome_s_code.js

awshome_s_code.js

159 ms

aws-target-mediator.js

aws-target-mediator.js

116 ms

aws-da.js

aws-da.js

112 ms

ip.json

ip.json

155 ms

S3_Video_Thumb.jpg

S3_Video_Thumb.jpg

178 ms

logo-nasdaq.png

logo-nasdaq.png

101 ms

600x400_Netflix_Logo.png

600x400_Netflix_Logo.png

99 ms

smugmug-logo.png

smugmug-logo.png

100 ms

wetransfer-logo.png

wetransfer-logo.png

99 ms

600x400_Airbnb_logo.png

600x400_Airbnb_logo.png

175 ms

Redfin%20uses%20Amazon%20DynamoDB.png

Redfin%20uses%20Amazon%20DynamoDB.png

189 ms

S3_Sketch_Durable.png

S3_Sketch_Durable.png

171 ms

S3_Sketch_LowCost.png

S3_Sketch_LowCost.png

173 ms

S3_Sketch_Available.png

S3_Sketch_Available.png

173 ms

S3_Sketch_Secure.png

S3_Sketch_Secure.png

176 ms

Benefits_ScaleUpDownAndFast.png

Benefits_ScaleUpDownAndFast.png

180 ms

DynamoDB_Benefit_Scalable.png

DynamoDB_Benefit_Scalable.png

178 ms

S3_Sketch_HighPerformance.png

S3_Sketch_HighPerformance.png

178 ms

Glacier_Sketch_Integrated.png

Glacier_Sketch_Integrated.png

173 ms

S3_Sketch_Simple.png

S3_Sketch_Simple.png

177 ms

aws_logo_105x39.png

aws_logo_105x39.png

91 ms

HelveticaNeueW01-55Roma.woff

HelveticaNeueW01-55Roma.woff

89 ms

jquery-amd.js

jquery-amd.js

80 ms

raw

raw

311 ms

raw

raw

319 ms

raw

raw

314 ms

raw

raw

313 ms

raw

raw

309 ms

raw

raw

309 ms

HelveticaNeueW01-75Bold.woff

HelveticaNeueW01-75Bold.woff

67 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

67 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

83 ms

raw

raw

219 ms

HelveticaNeueW01-45Ligh.woff

HelveticaNeueW01-45Ligh.woff

82 ms

an_amazon_company_186x25.png

an_amazon_company_186x25.png

58 ms

jquery.caroufredsel.js

jquery.caroufredsel.js

13 ms

jquery.touchSwipe.js

jquery.touchSwipe.js

9 ms

jquery.fancybox.js

jquery.fancybox.js

88 ms

marketo-munchkin.js

marketo-munchkin.js

58 ms

s73278742241673

s73278742241673

68 ms

index.html

index.html

130 ms

SEO Factors

syscall.ws SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Syscall.ws can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Syscall.ws main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

syscall.ws

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Syscall. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: