Report Summary

  • 29

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    49% of other websites

  • 79

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 48% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

antispam.typepad.com

Everything Typepad

Page Load Speed

4.7 sec in total

First Response

257 ms

Resources Loaded

2.9 sec

Page Rendered

1.5 sec

antispam.typepad.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to antispam.typepad.com homepage info - get ready to check Antispam Typepad best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about antispam.typepad.com

Tips, advice, and blogs by our Typepad community.

Visit antispam.typepad.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Antispam.typepad.com page load time and found that the first response time was 257 ms and then it took 4.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

antispam.typepad.com performance score

29

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.2 s

8/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.1 s

21/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value730 ms

41/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.123

84/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.7 s

11/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

everything.typepad.com

257 ms

bootstrap.min.css

535 ms

responsive-banner.css

307 ms

bxslider.css

312 ms

widgets.css

231 ms

Our browser made a total of 108 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Antispam.typepad.com, 23% (25 requests) were made to Static.typepad.com and 4% (4 requests) were made to Up3.typepad.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) relates to the external source Mperezsay.typepad.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 979.8 kB (24%)

Content Size

4.1 MB

After Optimization

3.2 MB

In fact, the total size of Antispam.typepad.com main page is 4.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 68.9 kB

  • Original 87.3 kB
  • After minification 81.2 kB
  • After compression 18.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 68.9 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 581.5 kB

  • Original 3.6 MB
  • After minification 3.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Antispam Typepad needs image optimization as it can save up to 581.5 kB or 16% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-64%

Potential reduce by 166.1 kB

  • Original 258.8 kB
  • After minification 254.9 kB
  • After compression 92.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 166.1 kB or 64% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 163.3 kB

  • Original 197.9 kB
  • After minification 177.7 kB
  • After compression 34.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Antispam.typepad.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 163.3 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 59 (58%)

Requests Now

101

After Optimization

42

The browser has sent 101 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Antispam Typepad. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

antispam.typepad.com accessibility score

79

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best Practices

antispam.typepad.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

antispam.typepad.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Antispam.typepad.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Antispam.typepad.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Antispam Typepad. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: