Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

Page Load Speed

45.4 sec in total

First Response

2 sec

Resources Loaded

42.5 sec

Page Rendered

948 ms

club.tom.com screenshot

About Website

Visit club.tom.com now to see the best up-to-date Club Tom content for China and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about club.tom.com

Visit club.tom.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Club.tom.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2 sec and then it took 43.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there was 1 request timeout, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.

Performance Metrics

club.tom.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

club.tom.com

1992 ms

www.tom.com

3515 ms

index_test_2014.css

464 ms

new20121123.css

20216 ms

new.css

450 ms

Our browser made a total of 138 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Club.tom.com, 32% (44 requests) were made to Tom.com and 17% (23 requests) were made to News.tom.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (20.2 sec) relates to the external source Tom.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 444.7 kB (20%)

Content Size

2.2 MB

After Optimization

1.8 MB

In fact, the total size of Club.tom.com main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 107.3 kB

  • Original 135.7 kB
  • After minification 113.4 kB
  • After compression 28.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 22.3 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 107.3 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 205.8 kB

  • Original 1.9 MB
  • After minification 1.7 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Club Tom needs image optimization as it can save up to 205.8 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 84.8 kB

  • Original 129.7 kB
  • After minification 127.8 kB
  • After compression 44.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 84.8 kB or 65% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 46.8 kB

  • Original 55.1 kB
  • After minification 45.9 kB
  • After compression 8.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Club.tom.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 46.8 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (11%)

Requests Now

135

After Optimization

120

The browser has sent 135 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Club Tom. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

SEO Factors

club.tom.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    GBK

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Club.tom.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Club.tom.com main page’s claimed encoding is gbk. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Club Tom. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: