2.8 sec in total
213 ms
2.3 sec
313 ms
Welcome to discussions.tomtom.com homepage info - get ready to check Discussions Tom best content for United Kingdom right away, or after learning these important things about discussions.tomtom.com
After much deliberation we have decided to close the TomTom Discussions community. The community has been an active part of our lives...
Visit discussions.tomtom.comWe analyzed Discussions.tomtom.com page load time and found that the first response time was 213 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
discussions.tomtom.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.6 s
31/100
10%
Value16.8 s
0/100
25%
Value12.2 s
3/100
10%
Value3,770 ms
1/100
30%
Value0.119
84/100
15%
Value19.4 s
2/100
10%
213 ms
210 ms
753 ms
46 ms
80 ms
Our browser made a total of 55 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Discussions.tomtom.com, 35% (19 requests) were made to D2nmfg2gp154mr.cloudfront.net and 22% (12 requests) were made to Dug71lzgx0zym.cloudfront.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (753 ms) relates to the external source En.discussions.tomtom.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.3 MB (58%)
2.2 MB
906.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Discussions.tomtom.com main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 117.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 47.3 kB, which is 35% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 117.3 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 25.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Discussions Tom images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 884.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 884.2 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 245.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Discussions.tomtom.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 245.1 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (43%)
47
27
The browser has sent 47 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Discussions Tom. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
discussions.tomtom.com
213 ms
en.discussions.tomtom.com
210 ms
en.discussions.tomtom.com
753 ms
forum-custom-tomtom-en-min.css
46 ms
modernizr.js
80 ms
utag.js
110 ms
jquery-ui-1.8.21.custom.min.js
81 ms
jquery.form.js
82 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.pack.js
84 ms
default.js
86 ms
follow.js
82 ms
jquery.textarea-expander.js
83 ms
global.js
81 ms
select2-3.2.js
86 ms
jquery.slimscroll.min.js
84 ms
forumIcons.js
123 ms
unread.js
84 ms
custom-tomtom.js
34 ms
tomtom-cookielaw.js
34 ms
home_visual.jpg
39 ms
bf1c475d-5d19-46e1-9f85-b4a7aa5671f3.png
274 ms
1442088086_467710.jpg
662 ms
jquery.min.js
99 ms
noAvatar50.png
30 ms
1422622119_151.jpg
64 ms
android-app.png
51 ms
rider.png
94 ms
multi-sport.png
93 ms
1423240341_312476.jpg
92 ms
1430064416_453491.jpg
93 ms
Flag-EN.png
93 ms
logo-insided.png
93 ms
ecbc7dd1-5c7a-4290-9b9d-ec37fa0f9845.png
267 ms
1a9826eb-5d10-41a0-be8f-8cd68dfb30f0.png
299 ms
27e64e6c-a5d4-4cc4-b961-1b0b82e645e8_thumb.jpg
300 ms
5f4278a4-6608-4c8f-95fd-8f9f426a1122.png
301 ms
1776f54e-7ea5-4f86-89c0-35847f5a3adf.png
301 ms
b6572fc6-b700-454a-bf9a-dfa0e7b7946f.png
301 ms
80176551-95af-41b8-bfaa-4baef5e57c59.png
301 ms
tt-logo.png
250 ms
gotham_ssm_book.woff
240 ms
gotham_ssm_bold.woff
239 ms
gotham_bold.woff
116 ms
gotham_book.woff
115 ms
tomtom-insided.woff
114 ms
utag.3.js
94 ms
ajaxCallback
394 ms
ajaxCallback
412 ms
analytics.js
40 ms
utag.v.js
21 ms
linkid.js
8 ms
collect
3 ms
collect
47 ms
366841d4-9cab-4eb8-88d4-bb75ca416817.png
29 ms
nr-1044.min.js
17 ms
discussions.tomtom.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
discussions.tomtom.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
discussions.tomtom.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Discussions.tomtom.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Discussions.tomtom.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
discussions.tomtom.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Discussions Tom. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: