Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

precious-metals-review.toptenreviews.com

Top Ten Reviews - Product Comparisons to Help You Buy Better | TopTenReviews

Page Load Speed

11.2 sec in total

First Response

291 ms

Resources Loaded

10.4 sec

Page Rendered

498 ms

precious-metals-review.toptenreviews.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Precious Metals Review Top Ten Reviews content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about precious-metals-review.toptenreviews.com

Our mission is to help you buy better. We spend thousands of hours researching products each year and test many of them in our Utah lab.

Visit precious-metals-review.toptenreviews.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Precious-metals-review.toptenreviews.com page load time and found that the first response time was 291 ms and then it took 10.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

precious-metals-review.toptenreviews.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

precious-metals-review.toptenreviews.com

291 ms

css

29 ms

ads.css

124 ms

carousel.css

125 ms

common.css

183 ms

Our browser made a total of 255 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Precious-metals-review.toptenreviews.com, 9% (23 requests) were made to Cdn.toptenreviews.com and 8% (21 requests) were made to Toptenreviews.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (8.1 sec) relates to the external source Tags.bluekai.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.6 MB (70%)

Content Size

2.3 MB

After Optimization

697.6 kB

In fact, the total size of Precious-metals-review.toptenreviews.com main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 479.3 kB

  • Original 618.3 kB
  • After minification 607.3 kB
  • After compression 139.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 479.3 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-31%

Potential reduce by 39.9 kB

  • Original 128.9 kB
  • After minification 89.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Precious Metals Review Top Ten Reviews needs image optimization as it can save up to 39.9 kB or 31% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 1.0 MB

  • Original 1.5 MB
  • After minification 1.4 MB
  • After compression 428.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.0 MB or 71% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 83.2 kB

  • Original 124.2 kB
  • After minification 121.2 kB
  • After compression 40.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Precious-metals-review.toptenreviews.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 83.2 kB or 67% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 170 (74%)

Requests Now

229

After Optimization

59

The browser has sent 229 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Precious Metals Review Top Ten Reviews. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 73 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

SEO Factors

precious-metals-review.toptenreviews.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Precious-metals-review.toptenreviews.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Precious-metals-review.toptenreviews.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Precious Metals Review Top Ten Reviews. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: