Report Summary

  • 22

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    40% of other websites

  • 58

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 25% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 42

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    18% of websites

remote.tide.no

Citrix Gateway

Page Load Speed

10.6 sec in total

First Response

1 sec

Resources Loaded

9.3 sec

Page Rendered

194 ms

remote.tide.no screenshot

About Website

Welcome to remote.tide.no homepage info - get ready to check Remote Tide best content for Norway right away, or after learning these important things about remote.tide.no

Visit remote.tide.no

Key Findings

We analyzed Remote.tide.no page load time and found that the first response time was 1 sec and then it took 9.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

remote.tide.no performance score

22

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value11.2 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value14.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value18.0 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,210 ms

20/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.7 s

14/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

remote.tide.no

1017 ms

index.html

760 ms

rdx.css

1502 ms

base.css

1243 ms

citrix-fonts.css

748 ms

Our browser made a total of 22 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Remote.tide.no and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3 sec) belongs to the original domain Remote.tide.no.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 5.8 kB (2%)

Content Size

357.1 kB

After Optimization

351.4 kB

In fact, the total size of Remote.tide.no main page is 357.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 351.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 4.0 kB

  • Original 5.9 kB
  • After minification 5.7 kB
  • After compression 1.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 4.0 kB or 68% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.8 kB

  • Original 351.3 kB
  • After minification 349.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Remote Tide images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (63%)

Requests Now

16

After Optimization

6

The browser has sent 16 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Remote Tide. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

remote.tide.no accessibility score

58

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Best Practices

remote.tide.no best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

remote.tide.no SEO score

42

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

Page is blocked from indexing

High

robots.txt is not valid

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Remote.tide.no can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Remote.tide.no main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Remote Tide. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: