Report Summary

  • 9

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    23% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

search.tarleton.edu

Degree Search | Degrees & Programs

Page Load Speed

17.2 sec in total

First Response

1.1 sec

Resources Loaded

13.3 sec

Page Rendered

2.8 sec

search.tarleton.edu screenshot

About Website

Welcome to search.tarleton.edu homepage info - get ready to check Search Tarleton best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about search.tarleton.edu

Degrees and Programs

Visit search.tarleton.edu

Key Findings

We analyzed Search.tarleton.edu page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 16.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

search.tarleton.edu performance score

9

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

27/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value14.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.6 s

25/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,680 ms

11/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value1.146

1/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.6 s

8/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

search.tarleton.edu

1052 ms

978 ms

js

78 ms

gtm.js

147 ms

js

239 ms

Our browser made a total of 88 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Search.tarleton.edu, 42% (37 requests) were made to Tarleton.edu and 18% (16 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (10.2 sec) relates to the external source Tarleton.matomo.cloud.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 278.9 kB (35%)

Content Size

805.2 kB

After Optimization

526.3 kB

In fact, the total size of Search.tarleton.edu main page is 805.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 401.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 257.0 kB

  • Original 291.9 kB
  • After minification 211.9 kB
  • After compression 34.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 79.9 kB, which is 27% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 257.0 kB or 88% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 33.3 kB
  • After minification 33.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Search Tarleton images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 16.9 kB

  • Original 401.8 kB
  • After minification 401.8 kB
  • After compression 384.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 5.0 kB

  • Original 78.2 kB
  • After minification 76.2 kB
  • After compression 73.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Search.tarleton.edu has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 51 (78%)

Requests Now

65

After Optimization

14

The browser has sent 65 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Search Tarleton. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 21 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

search.tarleton.edu accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

search.tarleton.edu best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

search.tarleton.edu SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Search.tarleton.edu can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Search.tarleton.edu main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Search Tarleton. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: