5.3 sec in total
301 ms
4.8 sec
159 ms
Click here to check amazing Secure TIDY content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about secure.tidy.com
Visit secure.tidy.comWe analyzed Secure.tidy.com page load time and found that the first response time was 301 ms and then it took 5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster. This domain responded with an error, which can significantly jeopardize Secure.tidy.com rating and web reputation
secure.tidy.com performance score
301 ms
853 ms
204 ms
51 ms
119 ms
Our browser made a total of 85 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 75% of them (64 requests) were addressed to the original Secure.tidy.com, 4% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Secure.tidy.com.
Page size can be reduced by 2.0 MB (83%)
2.4 MB
398.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Secure.tidy.com main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 2.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 41.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 41.5 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Secure TIDY images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.9 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.9 MB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 17.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Secure.tidy.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 17.0 kB or 77% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 66 (84%)
79
13
The browser has sent 79 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Secure TIDY. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 64 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
secure.tidy.com
301 ms
secure.tidy.com
853 ms
sweetalert.css
204 ms
font-awesome.min.css
51 ms
css
119 ms
main.css
390 ms
597920445.js
79 ms
goe1rrf.js
260 ms
116 ms
js
75 ms
jquery.js
889 ms
angular.js
1317 ms
angular-resource.js
518 ms
angular-cookies.js
521 ms
angular-sanitize.js
514 ms
angular-animate.js
965 ms
angular-aria.js
641 ms
hammer.js
859 ms
angular-touch.js
730 ms
fastclick.js
730 ms
angular-ui-router.js
1260 ms
angular-token-authentication.js
818 ms
angular-local-storage.js
950 ms
lodash.compat.js
1215 ms
angular-messages.js
1120 ms
angular-stripe.js
1079 ms
raygun.js
1215 ms
moment.js
1177 ms
angular-momentjs.js
1360 ms
ng-lodash.js
1457 ms
satellizer.js
1387 ms
ngMask.js
1506 ms
moment-timezone-with-data-2010-2020.js
1469 ms
sweetalert.min.js
1520 ms
SweetAlert.js
1598 ms
ui-bootstrap-tpls.js
1570 ms
bootstrap.js
1556 ms
angular-gravatar.js
1686 ms
card.js
1731 ms
card.js
1714 ms
angular-cookie.js
1688 ms
app.js
1747 ms
config.js
1803 ms
onboard.js
1894 ms
event
32 ms
onboard_step2.js
1601 ms
onboard_step3.js
1490 ms
onboard_step4.js
1480 ms
onboard_step5.js
1427 ms
onboard_step6.js
1408 ms
onboard_finished.js
1348 ms
customer.js
1340 ms
authentication.js
1360 ms
keyboard-submit.js
1230 ms
password-compare.js
1299 ms
tidy.js
1283 ms
homekeepers.js
1299 ms
plans.js
1213 ms
card.js
1157 ms
job.js
1183 ms
customer-profile.js
1189 ms
zipcodes.js
1044 ms
auth_helper.js
1182 ms
preferred_homekeeper.js
1185 ms
referral_codes.js
1160 ms
filters.js
981 ms
tidy-logo-horizontal.png
1090 ms
prum.min.js
30 ms
secure.tidy.com
36 ms
heap-1740366574.js
79 ms
gtm.js
111 ms
onboard.html
187 ms
channel.html
15 ms
h
47 ms
analytics.js
23 ms
collect
4 ms
collect
53 ms
collect
18 ms
collect
47 ms
ga-audiences
94 ms
ga-audiences
96 ms
tidy_client_1.jpg
388 ms
tidy_client_2.jpg
720 ms
kitchen-bg.jpg
359 ms
inspectlet.js
30 ms
secure.tidy.com SEO score
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Secure.tidy.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Secure.tidy.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
secure.tidy.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Secure TIDY. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: