Tools & Wizards About Us
tackoil.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 58

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    74% of other websites

  • 66

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 31% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 75

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    32% of websites

tackoil.com

Cheap and Reliable Web Hosting - fast shared hosting and KVM VPS

Page Load Speed

2.3 sec in total

First Response

697 ms

Resources Loaded

1.4 sec

Page Rendered

188 ms

tackoil.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Tackoil content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about tackoil.com

Learn More About Tack Oil

Visit tackoil.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Tackoil.com page load time and found that the first response time was 697 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

tackoil.com performance score

58

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

35/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.8 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.5 s

72/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value200 ms

90/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.033

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.8 s

55/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

tackoil.com

697 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

20 ms

styles.css

46 ms

css

25 ms

style.css

57 ms

Our browser made a total of 48 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 73% of them (35 requests) were addressed to the original Tackoil.com, 23% (11 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (697 ms) belongs to the original domain Tackoil.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 277.1 kB (50%)

Content Size

559.6 kB

After Optimization

282.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Tackoil.com main page is 559.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 223.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 12.2 kB

  • Original 16.8 kB
  • After minification 15.8 kB
  • After compression 4.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 12.2 kB or 73% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 2.1 kB

  • Original 194.1 kB
  • After minification 192.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Tackoil images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 157.2 kB

  • Original 223.5 kB
  • After minification 209.1 kB
  • After compression 66.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 157.2 kB or 70% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 105.6 kB

  • Original 125.1 kB
  • After minification 105.6 kB
  • After compression 19.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Tackoil.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 105.6 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (81%)

Requests Now

36

After Optimization

7

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 36 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Tackoil. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

tackoil.com

tackoil.com

697 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

20 ms

styles.css

styles.css

46 ms

css

css

25 ms

style.css

style.css

57 ms

css

css

37 ms

style.css

style.css

32 ms

shortcodes.css

shortcodes.css

37 ms

shortcodes_responsive.css

shortcodes_responsive.css

64 ms

tackoil.com

tackoil.com

480 ms

jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.css

jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.css

65 ms

page_templates.css

page_templates.css

74 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

117 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

82 ms

jquery.form.min.js

jquery.form.min.js

99 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

96 ms

ssba.min.js

ssba.min.js

111 ms

superfish.js

superfish.js

123 ms

custom.js

custom.js

122 ms

jquery.easing-1.3.pack.js

jquery.easing-1.3.pack.js

153 ms

jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.pack.js

jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.pack.js

161 ms

et-ptemplates-frontend.js

et-ptemplates-frontend.js

175 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

177 ms

new-oil2-1.png

new-oil2-1.png

138 ms

social-left-shadow.png

social-left-shadow.png

139 ms

twitter.png

twitter.png

136 ms

twitter-hover.png

twitter-hover.png

138 ms

facebook.png

facebook.png

139 ms

facebook-hover.png

facebook-hover.png

139 ms

rss.png

rss.png

140 ms

rss-hover.png

rss-hover.png

139 ms

google.png

google.png

141 ms

google-hover.png

google-hover.png

139 ms

featured-bg.jpg

featured-bg.jpg

163 ms

comments-cloud.png

comments-cloud.png

140 ms

excerpt-more.png

excerpt-more.png

140 ms

title-shadow.png

title-shadow.png

141 ms

do7-0avPC2vxor6SN2THGA.ttf

do7-0avPC2vxor6SN2THGA.ttf

25 ms

Li18TEFObx_yGdzKDoI_ci3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf

Li18TEFObx_yGdzKDoI_ci3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf

12 ms

cbAbzEjxTdN5KKmS-gA0tS3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf

cbAbzEjxTdN5KKmS-gA0tS3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf

20 ms

rr0ijB5_2nAJsAoZ6vECXaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

rr0ijB5_2nAJsAoZ6vECXaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

11 ms

WmVKXVcOuffP_qmCpFuyzS3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf

WmVKXVcOuffP_qmCpFuyzS3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf

19 ms

QoPu455RxV2raYSIFXAMBS3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf

QoPu455RxV2raYSIFXAMBS3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf

10 ms

Ji5epXNcpHu3r63lhS0cTi3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf

Ji5epXNcpHu3r63lhS0cTi3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf

24 ms

DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTdqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf

DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTdqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf

22 ms

u-WUoqrET9fUeobQW7jkRaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

u-WUoqrET9fUeobQW7jkRaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

23 ms

k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzNqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf

k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzNqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf

47 ms

EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-htqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf

EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-htqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf

21 ms

Accessibility Review

tackoil.com accessibility score

66

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

tackoil.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

tackoil.com SEO score

75

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tackoil.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Tackoil.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

tackoil.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Tackoil. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: