2.2 sec in total
100 ms
1.7 sec
355 ms
Visit tastingmenu.com now to see the best up-to-date Tastingmenu content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about tastingmenu.com
Focused on Food
Visit tastingmenu.comWe analyzed Tastingmenu.com page load time and found that the first response time was 100 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
tastingmenu.com performance score
100 ms
53 ms
81 ms
22 ms
109 ms
Our browser made a total of 58 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 21% of them (12 requests) were addressed to the original Tastingmenu.com, 26% (15 requests) were made to I0.wp.com and 19% (11 requests) were made to I2.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) relates to the external source I0.wp.com.
Page size can be reduced by 275.5 kB (34%)
815.8 kB
540.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Tastingmenu.com main page is 815.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 437.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 53.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 53.2 kB or 88% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 407 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Tastingmenu images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 84.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 84.6 kB or 60% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 137.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Tastingmenu.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 137.3 kB or 78% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (27%)
52
38
The browser has sent 52 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Tastingmenu. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
tastingmenu.com
100 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
53 ms
twentyfourteen.css
81 ms
css
22 ms
genericons.css
109 ms
style.css
100 ms
jetpack.css
149 ms
jquery.js
204 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
169 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
3 ms
gprofiles.js
56 ms
wpgroho.js
174 ms
functions.js
193 ms
tiled-gallery.js
278 ms
e-201611.js
3 ms
01-table.jpg
575 ms
03-butter.jpg
562 ms
05-spooningicecream.jpg
474 ms
02-bread.jpg
955 ms
04-egg.jpg
538 ms
06-gazpacho.jpg
547 ms
12-lobster.jpg
739 ms
13-saute.jpg
1063 ms
14-violin.jpg
1040 ms
15-spinachandcarrot.jpg
1078 ms
18-cutting.jpg
1041 ms
20-beets.jpg
1147 ms
21-vinegarexam.jpg
1388 ms
23-chicken.jpg
1276 ms
29-spooning.jpg
1385 ms
31-tomatoandicecream.jpg
1394 ms
32-glazedcookies.jpg
1386 ms
08-tomatosoup.jpg
527 ms
09-beetgelee.jpg
571 ms
10-potatoes.jpg
816 ms
16-monkfish.jpg
722 ms
17-saltmound.jpg
1048 ms
25-passard.jpg
826 ms
26-passard2.jpg
837 ms
30-saucing.jpg
1010 ms
33-millefeuille.jpg
1184 ms
34-thegang.jpg
1197 ms
07-consomme.jpg
829 ms
11-gratin.jpg
841 ms
19-open.jpg
572 ms
22-wholechicken.jpg
1163 ms
24-cheese.jpg
324 ms
27-tomatosaute.jpg
856 ms
28-plating.jpg
1212 ms
9k-RPmcnxYEPm8CNFsH2gg.woff
77 ms
KT3KS9Aol4WfR6Vas8kNcg.woff
77 ms
wkfQbvfT_02e2IWO3yYueQ.woff
77 ms
BVtM30trf7q_jfqYeHfjtA.woff
77 ms
Genericons.svg
119 ms
8AAnjaY2BgYGQAgjO2i86D6AshzNIwGgBAmQUAAAA=
75 ms
g.gif
70 ms
hovercard.css
50 ms
services.css
59 ms
tastingmenu.com SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tastingmenu.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Tastingmenu.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
tastingmenu.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Tastingmenu. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: