3.1 sec in total
182 ms
2.7 sec
189 ms
Welcome to technic.com homepage info - get ready to check Technic best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about technic.com
Visit technic.comWe analyzed Technic.com page load time and found that the first response time was 182 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
technic.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.6 s
62/100
10%
Value5.9 s
14/100
25%
Value4.5 s
72/100
10%
Value950 ms
29/100
30%
Value0.742
6/100
15%
Value10.8 s
22/100
10%
182 ms
293 ms
97 ms
91 ms
98 ms
Our browser made a total of 57 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 77% of them (44 requests) were addressed to the original Technic.com, 9% (5 requests) were made to Translate.googleapis.com and 5% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) relates to the external source Visitortracklog.com.
Page size can be reduced by 239.7 kB (26%)
930.6 kB
690.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Technic.com main page is 930.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 568.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 26.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 26.6 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 32.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Technic images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 108.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 108.2 kB or 45% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 72.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Technic.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 72.2 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 40 (73%)
55
15
The browser has sent 55 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Technic. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 20 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
technic.com
182 ms
www.technic.com
293 ms
styles.css
97 ms
node.css
91 ms
defaults.css
98 ms
system.css
102 ms
system-menus.css
105 ms
user.css
96 ms
lightbox.css
135 ms
mollom.css
140 ms
nice_menus.css
140 ms
nice_menus_default.css
139 ms
html-elements.css
164 ms
tabs.css
161 ms
messages.css
177 ms
block-editing.css
181 ms
wireframes.css
186 ms
layout.css
177 ms
technicv2.css
240 ms
topmenu.css
214 ms
jquery.js
274 ms
drupal.js
243 ms
collapse.js
244 ms
lightbox_video.js
225 ms
lightbox.js
253 ms
nice_menus.js
264 ms
element.js
35 ms
AC_RunActiveContent.js
352 ms
analytics.js
5 ms
live.js
149 ms
collect
11 ms
collect
6 ms
print.css
40 ms
topmainbanner.png
144 ms
logo.gif
57 ms
lock.gif
60 ms
envelope.png
59 ms
globe.png
47 ms
region.png
128 ms
info.png
90 ms
search_button.jpg
107 ms
banner.png
466 ms
technic-honeywell.jpg
225 ms
tshlogo-homepgcolor-275_0_1.png
233 ms
AT4608-web.jpg
264 ms
epdbuilding2011.jpg
232 ms
translateelement.css
65 ms
main.js
76 ms
menu-background.png
134 ms
menu-dropdown-background.png
145 ms
footer-background.png
169 ms
loghit.asp
1683 ms
element_main.js
40 ms
translate_24dp.png
62 ms
l
45 ms
cleardot.gif
66 ms
te_ctrl3.gif
15 ms
technic.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
technic.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
technic.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Technic.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Technic.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
technic.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Technic. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: