Tools & Wizards About Us
technologic.ru screenshot

Report Summary

  • 31

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    51% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 69% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 81

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    43% of websites

technologic.ru

www.reutov.org | Малое предпринимательство в муниципальных образованиях

Page Load Speed

24.7 sec in total

First Response

1.4 sec

Resources Loaded

22.9 sec

Page Rendered

425 ms

technologic.ru screenshot

About Website

Visit technologic.ru now to see the best up-to-date Technologic content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about technologic.ru

Visit technologic.ru

Key Findings

We analyzed Technologic.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 1.4 sec and then it took 23.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there was 1 request timeout, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.

Performance Metrics

technologic.ru performance score

31

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

21/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.8 s

15/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value690 ms

43/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.114

86/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.1 s

16/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

technologic.ru

1383 ms

kernel_main.css

734 ms

kernel_intranet.css

761 ms

page_3b7e13422de368ee02fde08e58c8b6a4.css

1030 ms

pubstyles.min.css

755 ms

Our browser made a total of 45 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (41 requests) were addressed to the original Technologic.ru, 2% (1 request) were made to Cnt.rambler.ru and 2% (1 request) were made to Bizinformation.org. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (20.5 sec) relates to the external source Bizinformation.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 757.8 kB (77%)

Content Size

983.8 kB

After Optimization

226.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Technologic.ru main page is 983.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 618.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 45.7 kB

  • Original 59.6 kB
  • After minification 56.4 kB
  • After compression 13.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 45.7 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 2.7 kB

  • Original 24.2 kB
  • After minification 21.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Technologic needs image optimization as it can save up to 2.7 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 467.3 kB

  • Original 618.4 kB
  • After minification 598.0 kB
  • After compression 151.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 467.3 kB or 76% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 242.0 kB

  • Original 281.6 kB
  • After minification 261.1 kB
  • After compression 39.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Technologic.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 242.0 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (64%)

Requests Now

42

After Optimization

15

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Technologic. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

technologic.ru

technologic.ru

1383 ms

kernel_main.css

kernel_main.css

734 ms

kernel_intranet.css

kernel_intranet.css

761 ms

page_3b7e13422de368ee02fde08e58c8b6a4.css

page_3b7e13422de368ee02fde08e58c8b6a4.css

1030 ms

pubstyles.min.css

pubstyles.min.css

755 ms

popup.min.css

popup.min.css

611 ms

template_2b6ed91284d5b510e7698dd10ad1f6d5.css

template_2b6ed91284d5b510e7698dd10ad1f6d5.css

623 ms

kernel_main.js

kernel_main.js

1475 ms

popup_menu.min.js

popup_menu.min.js

769 ms

ajax.min.js

ajax.min.js

880 ms

silverlight.js

silverlight.js

778 ms

wmvplayer.js

wmvplayer.js

782 ms

flvscript.js

flvscript.js

778 ms

template_863dab79e09f2d77f2553eafd90d690a.js

template_863dab79e09f2d77f2553eafd90d690a.js

897 ms

page_adad4001f3b60dfc569c9113abcdbf56.js

page_adad4001f3b60dfc569c9113abcdbf56.js

1204 ms

top100.jcn

top100.jcn

380 ms

header_bg2.gif

header_bg2.gif

141 ms

fish-1.gif

fish-1.gif

165 ms

home.gif

home.gif

150 ms

map.gif

map.gif

148 ms

printer.gif

printer.gif

165 ms

top_menu_bg.gif

top_menu_bg.gif

167 ms

zebra_bg6.gif

zebra_bg6.gif

278 ms

zebra_bg2.gif

zebra_bg2.gif

301 ms

arrows.gif

arrows.gif

300 ms

news.gif

news.gif

330 ms

sertif_sm.gif

sertif_sm.gif

335 ms

kmp_03.gif

kmp_03.gif

333 ms

portal.gif

portal.gif

410 ms

100_9855_thumbnail.jpg

100_9855_thumbnail.jpg

504 ms

100_9854_thumbnail.jpg

100_9854_thumbnail.jpg

489 ms

new.jpg

new.jpg

521 ms

01_4x4.jpg

01_4x4.jpg

520 ms

02_repair.jpg

02_repair.jpg

500 ms

03_race.jpg

03_race.jpg

551 ms

04_vwclub.jpg

04_vwclub.jpg

629 ms

bullet_dot.gif

bullet_dot.gif

636 ms

gadget.gif

gadget.gif

667 ms

nopic_user_50_noborder.gif

nopic_user_50_noborder.gif

667 ms

button_back.gif

button_back.gif

20461 ms

arrows.gif

arrows.gif

655 ms

icdoc.gif

icdoc.gif

659 ms

top100.scn

top100.scn

267 ms

jwplayer.js

jwplayer.js

861 ms

logo.png

logo.png

161 ms

Accessibility Review

technologic.ru accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

technologic.ru best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

technologic.ru SEO score

81

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    RU

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Technologic.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Technologic.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

technologic.ru

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Technologic. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: